Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dewandar Prasad @ Devendra Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the prima facie free‑fight nature of the incident and lack of a direct assault allegation against the petitioner, anticipatory bail was warranted.

Summary

The petitioner, Dewandar Prasad, was named in an FIR for alleged assault and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, arising from a land dispute. He contended that the incident was a free‑fight in which both parties were injured and that he had no intention to cause death, merely instigating others. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR does not allege a direct physical assault by him and that he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The court, noting the prima facie nature of a free‑fight and the absence of a specific assault allegation against the petitioner, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. in view of the allegations under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita.
  • Whether the petitioner had the intention to cause death as alleged in the FIR.
  • Whether the FIR specifically charges the petitioner with physical assault.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • free-fight
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • intention to cause death
  • clean antecedent
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40040 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2026 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Dewandar Prasad @ Devendra Kumar Patel S/O Shri Shyamdev Prasad R/O
                 Vill.- Gangawa, P.S.- Sidhwaliya, Distt.- Gopalganj
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Gyan Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-06-2026               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                             2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case

                   No. 19 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 324(4), 351(3),

                   352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (in short, the

                   ‘B.N.S.’).

                             3. As per FIR, petitioner alongwith other co-accused

                   persons alleged to assault the informant and others by using

                   lathi, rod etc. causing head and bodily injury, having intention to

                   cause their death.

                             4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   submitted that the occurrence took place in the background of

                   land dispute. It is pointed out that the occurrence was free-fight
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40040 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                            2/3




          in nature, where both parties received injuries and, therefore, it

          can be safely said that petitioner was not under intention to

          cause death. It is submitted that for same set of occurrence,

          petitioner has also lodged a case against the informant and

          others, which is registered as Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 20/2026.

                   5. Arguing further, it is submitted by learned counsel that

          FIR clearly suggest that the allegation as to cause physical

          assault is not available against the petitioner, rather he was only

          instigated the other co-accused persons during course of

          occurrence as to assault the informant and others. Petitioner

          claimed clean antecedent.

                   6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                   7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as prima facie occurrence appears free-

          fight in nature where both parties received injury, coupled with

          the fact that allegation of physical assault appears not available

          against this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent,

          accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event of his

          arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is

          directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40040 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate-V, Gopalganj/concerned court in connection

                     with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026, subject to the

                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

                     (in short “B.N.S.S.”).


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.