Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Munilal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

Munilal Yadav was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant’s son under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the dispute arose from a neighbourhood quarrel, the injuries were simple, and no criminal case was filed by his side, negating any intention to cause death. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail, noting his involvement in another criminal case. The court examined the medical report and concluded that the nature of injury did not indicate an intention to cause death. Consequently, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances
  • Whether the nature of the injury demonstrates an intention to cause death under the charged sections
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal case affects the grant of anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • injury
  • Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • intent to cause death

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40768 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2026 Thana- BANNUBAGICHA District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Munilal Yadav Son of Late Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Jankidih
                 (Beldariya), P.S.- Bannu Bagicha, District- Lakhisarai
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Bhim Sen Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                             2. The accused-petitioner, named in the F.I.R., is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bannu Bagicha

                   P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 303,

                   109 & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (in short,

                   the ‘B.N.S.’).

                             3. The allegation against the petitioner is to assault

                   the informant and her son namely, Surendra Yadav during

                   the course of occurrence, where other named co-accused

                   persons alleged to assault the family members of the

                   informant.

                             4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40768 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner submitted that the occurrence took place due to

          neighbourhood dispute and differences, where both parties

          received injury, but fairly conceded that no any criminal

          case was initiated by the petitioner’s side against the

          informant and others for the same occurrence. It is

          submitted that upon medical examination, nature of injury,

          as alleged to be inflicted by this petitioner upon Surendra

          Yadav, found simple in nature, negating intention to cause

          death.

                   5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted

          that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, in

          which he is on bail.

                   6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                   7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and

          by taking note of the fact as the injury as alleged to inflicted

          by the petitioner on the son of the informant, upon medical

          examination, found simple in nature, prima facie negate the

          intention to cause death, accordingly,               above-named

          petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a

          period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40768 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

                     (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount

                     each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st

                     Class, Lakhisarai/concerned court in connection with Bannu

                     Bagicha P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026, subject to the conditions

                     as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section

                     482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short

                     “B.N.S.S.”).


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.