Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted as the liquor was not recovered from the petitioner's conscious physical possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022, with 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that the vehicle was lent to a friend, Bipin Kumar, and that he did not have conscious physical possession of the liquor at the time of recovery. The prosecution opposed his bail application, noting that the petitioner was already on bail in another criminal case. The court examined whether the recovery of liquor from a vehicle owned by the petitioner, but not in his possession, satisfied the possession element required for the offence. Concluding that the liquor was not recovered from his conscious possession, the court directed that he be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be granted bail when the alleged illicit liquor was recovered from a vehicle registered in his name but not in his conscious possession
  • Whether the facts satisfy the elements of an offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31169 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2026 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar Son of Jugdev Sao @ Jagdev Saw Resident of Village -
                 Gulni, P.S.- Gurua, Distt.- Gaya
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Vijay Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
3   08-06-2026                       Heard the parties

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Amas P.S. Case

                   No. 104 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Section 30(a) of Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be

                   engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor,

                   where, there is recovery of 50 litres of IMFL/country made

                   liquor

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that recovery of alleged illicit liquor

                   was made from motorcycle bearing registration no. BR02BM

                   6274, of which petitioner was the registered owner and for

                   said reason only he was implicated with the present case. It

                   is submitted that the aforesaid motorcycle was given to his

                   friend namely, Bipin Kumar, who misused it. It is further
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31169 of 2026(3) dt.08-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      submitted that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was not made

                      from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner.

                      While concluding arguments, it is submitted that petitioner

                      found involved in one more criminal case where he is on bail.

                                   5 Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                      taking note of fact as recovery of alleged illicit liquor not

                      appears to be made from the conscious physical possession

                      of the petitioner, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the

                      event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within

                      a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail,

                      furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                      of the learned Exclusive Spl. Excise court no. 5, Gaya

                      /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection

                      with Amas P.S. Case No. 104 of 2026, subject to the

                      conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.



                                                               (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.