Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Excise Act, 2022

6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6

Jagarnath RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jagarnath Ray was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 1013.25 litres of IMFL recovered from an open bamboo grove behind a third party's house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession, as it was recovered …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022 for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 43.200 litres recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name but owned by a friend. He argued that he did not have conscious …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022, with 50 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that the vehicle was lent to a friend, Bipin …

Sakaldev MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sakaldev Mahto, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022, with 240 litres of liquor recovered from a vehicle registered in his name. He contended that the vehicle had been sold to another person in …

Sujit Ram @ Baby Ram @ BabiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sujit Ram, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022 for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 76.64 litres recovered. He argued that his name was mentioned only on the basis of suspicion and that his prior …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, was implicated in Excise Case No. 227 of 2026 under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 71 litres of illicit wine seized near a forest boundary. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a secret informant’s tip that named the petitioner, …