Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Nazir @ NazirversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Summary

Petitioners Md Nazir and Shekh Reyazul Haque sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a land‑dispute incident on 3 August 2025, during which they allegedly broke a wall, entered an informant’s house, and seized Rs 40,000 and jewellery. The prosecution charged them under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences of rioting, robbery, and assault. The petitioners contended that both parties were co‑villagers and that the allegations were merely ornamental, asserting a case‑and‑counter‑case scenario. The State opposed the bail application, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the nature of the accusations, the existence of a counter‑case, and the surrounding circumstances, granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • robbery
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3165 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- Pachpakdi District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md Nazir @ Nazir S/O Aliyash @ Md Aliyash R/O Village- Gadahiya, P.S-
                  Pachpakari, Distt.- East Champarn.
           2.    Shekh Reyazul Haque @ Reyaj S/O Late Abdul Manan R/O Village-
                 Gadahiya, P.S- Pachpakari, Distt.- East Champarn.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Mr. Shahid Jawed
                                                   Mr. Aamir Suhail, Advocates
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   State.

                                 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3),

                   305, 331(5), 334(2), 352, 351(2), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                 3. As per prosecution case, on 3.08.2025 at about

                   12:30 AM, on account of land dispute, all the F.I.R. named

                   accused persons, including these petitioners, armed with various

                   weapons, started breaking wall of the house of informant. Upon

                   protest, the accused persons entered the house of informant and

                   snatched Rs. 40,000/- cash and some jewellery.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3165 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                      both parties are co-villagers and on account of on-going land

                      dispute between the parties, altercation took place in which both

                      sides inflicted injuries on each other. Case and counter case.

                      Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case

                      grave.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                      the bail application.

                                   6. Considering the nature of accusation, case and

                      counter case and other facts and circumstances of the case, this

                      anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above

                      named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before

                      the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be

                      enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

                      thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana,

                      Dhaka,      East     Champaran,         Motihari    in connection   with

                      Pachpakari P. S. Case No. 125 of 2025, subject to condition as

                      laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.