Patna High Court
Tukan MandalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that no specific allegation of assault or caste‑related filthy language is made against the petitioner, and therefore bail is granted.
Summary
The petitioner, Tukan Mandal, sought bail in a criminal case (Jhajha P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025) where he was alleged to have participated in assault and caste‑based abusive language against an informant, with offences listed under various sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST (POA) Act. The prosecution’s FIR described a free‑fight among several accused, but specific assault allegations were directed only at co‑accused Ravi Mandal, Kundan Mandal and Bhagirath Mandal, not at the petitioner. The petitioner argued he had no specific charge of assault or caste‑related abuse and possessed a clean antecedent. The informant’s counsel contended that all accused, including the petitioner, used filthy language and assaulted him. After reviewing the case diary and witness statements, the court found no direct allegation against the petitioner and concluded that the material did not justify denial of bail. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is specifically implicated in the alleged assault and caste‑based abusive language.
- Whether the material on record justifies denial of bail under the offences charged.
- Whether the court may grant bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S pending verification of antecedents.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 3(5), 351(1), 352, 482(2), 74
- POCSO Act — s. 8
- SC/ST (POA) Act — s. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(va)
Subjects
- bail
- assault
- caste harassment
- POCSO Act
- SC/ST (POA) Act
- Section 482
- criminal procedure
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31792 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2025 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui
======================================================
Tukan Mandal S/O Late Narayan Mandal R/O Village - Shair, Police Station
-Jhajha, District - Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. XXX S/O YYY R/O Vill.- Baijalpura, Ward No.- 1, P.S- Jhajha, Dist- Jamui.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Binay Krishna, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Shailesh Anand, Advocate
: Mr. Abhiyanshu Ranjan, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 17-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP
for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025, for allegedly having
committed offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109,
74, 351(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., Section 8 of the POCSO
Act and Sections 3(1)(S), 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (POA)
Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been lodged
on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to
the effect that whenever the minor daughter of the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31792 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
2/5
along with her friend used to go to school, the three accused
persons named in the First Information Report, used to tease
them, due to which the daughter of the informant and her friend
stopped going to school. When she disclosed the incident to the
informant, then on 24.10.2025, the informant along with his
brother and sister went to the village of the accused persons. All
the accused persons, including the petitioner herein started using
filthy language, including caste related filthy language against
the informant and others and also assaulted them. The specific
allegation of assault is there against co-accused Ravi Mandal,
who assaulted the informant on his head with a tangi, due to
which he sustained injuries on his head. It has further been
alleged that co-accused Kundan Mandal assaulted the informant
on his hand and leg with a stick and co-accused Bhagirath
Mandal assaulted the informant with tangi and rod due to
which, the informant received twenty stitches on his head and
he was referred to Sadar Hospital at Jamui.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. He further submits that no specific allegation of
assault is there against the petitioner or even the allegation of
using filthy language or teasing the daughter of the informant is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31792 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
3/5
not against the petitioner. He further submits that there is
general allegation of using filthy language against all the
accused persons, including the petitioner. The wife of the co-
accused Kundan Kumar also lodged a First Information Report
bearing Jhajha P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025, against the informant
and five other persons. He further submits that the petitioner has
got a clean antecedent.
5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the informant submits that the petitioner and other accused
persons used caste based filthy language against the informant
and his family members in full public view and also assaulted
the informant, due to which he sustained injuries on his head
and he also received twenty stitches on his head. He further
submits that the case is of 2025 and in the case diary, specific
material has come that the petitioner and others used filthy
language against the informant and his family members in full
public view.
6. The learned APP for the State vehemently opposes
the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the
petitioner and his family members assaulted the informant and
his family members due to which, the informant sustained
injuries on his head.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31792 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
4/5
7. Having heard the rival submissions and after going
through the records and the case diary, it appears that there was
a free fight in-between the parties for which, case and counter
case has been lodged. The allegation of assault and teasing the
daughter of the informant is not against the petitioner, rather the
specific allegation of assault on the head of the informant is
there against co-accused Ravi Mandal. Further, allegation of
assault upon the informant is there against Kundan Mandal and
Bhagirath Mandal. From perusal of the case diary, it would
transpire that the witnesses in their statement recorded in
paragraph nos. 15 and 16 have stated about the occurrence and
have also stated that both the parties were using filthy language
but, there is no statement to the effect that any caste related
filthy language was used against the informant or his family
members or the petitioner was involved in any such act.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the
petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender
within a period of six weeks, be released on bail furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive
Special Court (POCSO), Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S.
Case No. 510 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31792 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
5/5
under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, with further condition:
(1) The learned Court concerned shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it
is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation
of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
Pallavi/Mridula
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.