Patna High Court
Awnit KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- KHATIM REZA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail, directing release on bail upon furnishing the prescribed bond and sureties if arrested or surrendered within six weeks.
Summary
The petitioners, Awnit Kumar and Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry case (Madhubani Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025) alleging they demanded Rs.10 lakh, gold and a car for the marriage of the informant's daughter to Vivek Kumar, the son of petitioner No.2. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners conditioned the marriage on receipt of the dowry, invoking Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners contended that the daughter herself refused the marriage, no dowry was demanded, and they have no criminal record. The State opposed the anticipatory bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, ordered that if the petitioners are arrested or surrender within six weeks, they shall be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita in a dowry demand case.
- Whether the allegations of dowry demand under Sections 318(4), 3(5) of BNSS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act merit denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 3(5), 482(2)
- Dowry Prohibition Act — s. 3, 4
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- dowry prohibition
- Section 482
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- criminal procedure
- false implication
- marriage dowry demand
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31794 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani
======================================================
1. Awnit Kumar, son of Ajay Kumar, Resident of Village -Naya Tola Sad
Bahwana Nagar, Ps- Muzaffarpur (Sadar) Dist- Muzaffrarpur
2. Ajay Kumar, Son of Rameshwar Prasad, Resident of Village -Naya Tola Sad
Bahwana Nagar, Ps- Muzaffarpur (Sadar) Dist- Muzaffrarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kiran Devi, Wife of Om Prakash Sah, Resident of Village - Mahila college
road, Ward no. 23, Ps- Madhubani Town, Dist- Madhubani
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
2 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with
Madhubani Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 dated 01.12.2025
instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 3(5) of
the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the marriage of
the informant's daughter was fixed with Vivek Kumar, who is son
of petitioner no. 2. On 05.06.2025, the ring ceremony was
performed. Thereafter, the petitioners and his family members
demanded ten lakh rupees, 10 Tola gold & a Brezza car as dowry
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31794 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
2/3
and thereafter they will fix the date of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in
this case. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the younger
brother of the main accused, namely Vivek Kumar and petitioner
no. 2 is the father of the said Vivek Kumar. The petitioners never
refused to fix the date of marriage, rather, it was the informant's
daughter, Priyanka Kumari @ Varsha, who during telephonic
conversation with Vivek Kumar, stated that she was not at all
interested in marrying with him as she is involved with her
colleague working in the same company, namely, Reliance Jio
Centre, Madhubani. The allegation for refusal of marriage is not
only on part of the petitioners rather the said refusal has been
made by the girl. The petitioners never demanded any dowry for
solemnizing the said marriage. Lastly, it has been submitted that
the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the
event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period of six
weeks from today, in connection with Madhubani Mahila P.S.
Case No. 64 of 2025, they will be released on bail upon furnishing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31794 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
3/3
bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M.,
Madhubani subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2)
of the B.N.S.S.
(Khatim Reza, J)
premchand/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.