Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Wajid AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Wajid Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, stemming from a village dispute over the accidental death of a goat. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the incident was a spontaneous scuffle, and that the FIR contained vague, omnibus allegations against many accused. The petitioner highlighted his young age, clean criminal record, and that he had been in custody since 17 March 2026. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the petitioner’s antecedents, the nature of the allegations, and the circumstances of the incident, the Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged
  • Whether the allegations in the FIR are sufficiently specific to justify continued detention
  • Whether the petitioner’s age, clean antecedent, and the genesis of the incident warrant bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • false implication
  • village dispute
  • clean antecedent
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32140 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2026 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Wajid Ansari Son of Md. Naeem Ansari @ Naimuddin Ansari, Resident of
                 Village- Nekara, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :       Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad, Adv.
                                                   Mrs. Jahan Ara, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                          Heard the parties.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Agrer P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2),

                   109, 125(a), 125(b), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                 3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner’s

                   counsel are that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case due to village dispute arising out of

                   an accidental death of a goat and the occurrence took place in the

                   background of sudden altercation and scuffle between both the

                   side and the prosecution case itself suggests free fight in the heat

                   of the moment. It is further submitted that even according to the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32140 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       FIR the specific allegation against the petitioner is only of assault

                       by danda and the allegations are general and omnibus in nature

                       which is against 8 named and 20-25 unnamed accused persons. It

                       is lastly submitted that the petitioner bears no criminal

                       antecedent and has been languishing in jail since 17.03.2026.

                                    4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of

                       the petitioner.

                                    5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and

                       considering the statements made in the petition as well as above

                       submissions, coupled with petitioner’s young age, his fair and

                       clean antecedent, the nature of allegation appearing against him

                       and also the genesis of occurrence, this Court is inclined to

                       release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above

                       be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-

                       (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                       each to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with

                       Agrer P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026.



                                                 (Shailendra Singh, J)
annu/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.