Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Maheshwar Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioner Maheshwar Yadav feared arrest after police recovered 127.2 litres of illicit liquor allegedly being transported from Nepal. One of the carriers, Manjay Kumar, was apprehended and claimed he was acting on the petitioner’s instructions. The petitioner asserted he was not present at the scene, no liquor was found in his possession, and the only evidence against him was the co‑accused’s confession. He applied for anticipatory bail, while the State opposed the relief. The Court, noting the lack of direct material and the petitioner’s willingness to cooperate, granted anticipatory bail on condition of surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, and directed compliance by the Exclusive Special Judge (Excise).

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the sole incriminating evidence is a co‑accused’s confession.
  • Whether the petitioner falls within the ambit of Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • co‑accused confession
  • Section 482
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32251 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2026 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Maheshwar Yadav @ Mahesh Prasad Yadav S/o Kishun Lal Yadav R/o
                 Village - Pathrahi, PS - Laukaha, District - Madhubani
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026, instituted under

                   Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   127.2 litres of illicit liquor from five bags which were carrying

                   by 4 to 5 persons coming from the side of Nepal. After seeing

                   the police, they fled away throwing the bags but one person,

                   namely, Manjay Kumar was apprehended on the spot who

                   disclosed that he was carrying the liquor at the instruction of the

                   petitioner and others.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32251 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      case due to four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

                      Petitioner was not present on the spot. Except the confessional

                      statement of co-accused, Manjay Kumar, there is no material

                      against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the

                      conscious possession of the petitioner. He has no concern with

                      the seized liquor. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the

                      investigation and trial.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail.

                                   6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                      case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and petitioner

                      was not present on the spot, in the event of arrest or surrender

                      before the Court below within six weeks from today, the

                      petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                      10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge

                      (Excise), Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukaha

                      P.S. Case No. 39 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in

                      Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

                      (B.N.S.S.), 2023.


                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
rakhi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.