Patna High Court
Lal Babu ShahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR JHA
Holding
The court ordered the release of the petitioners on bail subject to prescribed conditions.
Summary
The petitioners, Lal Babu Shah and Lakshman Kumar Shah, were arrested after police claimed to have recovered 135 litres of illicit Nepali liquor during a vehicle check and charged them under Sections 274 and 275 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioners contended that no incriminating material was found on them, that the seizure lacked independent witnesses, and that procedural violations under Sections 103(3) and 103(8) of the B.N.S.S. occurred, while the State highlighted an antecedent similar case. The court considered the custody period and the submissions of both sides. It granted bail to both petitioners on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including a close relative as bailor and compliance with Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. The order released the petitioners from custody pending trial.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite the alleged recovery of illicit liquor
- Whether procedural violations under Sections 103(3) and 103(8) of the B.N.S.S. affect the bail application
- Whether the antecedent case of similar nature is a ground to deny bail
- Applicability of Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. in granting bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 103(3), 103(8), 274, 275, 3(5), 480(3)
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- illicit liquor
- procedural violation
- antecedent case
- criminal procedure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- B.N.S. 2023
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32497 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2026 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani
======================================================
1. Lal Babu Shah S/o Ajit Sah Resident of Village - Maniarwa Ward no 3, P.S. -
Khajauli, District - Madhubani.
2. Lakshman Kumar Shah @ Laxman Kumar Sah S/o Premlal Shah Resident
of Village - Maniarwa Ward no 3, P.S. - Khajauli, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners
seeks and is granted permission to make necessary correction in
paragraph no. 1 of the present regular bail petition by inserting
Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, which
has inadvertently not been mentioned earlier, in the course of
the day.
3. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in
connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026, dated
08.04.2026, registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 274 and 275 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023
and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32497 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
2/3
4. As per the prosecution case, during vehicle
checking, the petitioners tried to run away from the Police party,
but they were apprehended and on search of the vehicles,
recovery of 135 litres of illicit country made Nepali liquor was
made.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and they have
falsely been implicated in the present case. Nothing
incriminating has been recovered from person or possession of
the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 is the driver and petitioner no. 2
is the owner of the seized vehicle, but nothing incriminating has
been recovered from this vehicle and the story of recovery of
illicit liquor is false and concocted. There are no independent
witnesses to the seizure and there is violation of Sections 103(3)
and 103(8) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. Learned counsel next submits
that petitioners are having antecedent of one case of similar
nature. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioners are in
custody since 09.04.2026.
6. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State
opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners and
submits that petitioners are having antecedent of one case of
similar nature.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32497 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
3/3
7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the
period of custody of the petitioners, the petitioners, above-
named, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Madhubani / concerned
Court, in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026,
subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the
B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and
every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned
trial Court.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates
or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the
petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Shahnawaz/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.