Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Muresh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Muresh Paswan was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court considered the request and the circumstances of the arrest. It granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner can withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3250 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2024 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Muresh Paswan S/o Siyacharan Paswan R/o Village- Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj,
                 Distt- Jehanabad
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.