Patna High Court
Gouri Shankar Ray @ Gouri ShankarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions and verification of his criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Gouri Shankar Ray, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 780 of 2023) for the alleged recovery of 6,600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed he was unaware that the vehicle would be used for the alleged offence. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, arguing that ownership of the vehicle alone should not constitute sufficient grounds for arrest. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, a deposit of Rs. 2,500 with the Lawyers’ Association, and a six‑week period for surrender, subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in the context of an alleged excise offence.
- Whether mere ownership of the seized vehicle suffices to justify arrest and denial of anticipatory bail.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- vehicle ownership
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- bail conditions
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3285 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-780 Year-2023 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Gouri Shankar Ray @ Gouri Shankar Son of Ram Lakhan Ray @ Ramlakhan
Yadav R/o - Saguniya, P.S - Baheri, District - Darbhanga, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Asha Devi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of
recovery of 6.600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized
vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use
his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3285 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
2/3
create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated,
it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware
that Lala would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged,
who was also apprehended from the spot.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event
of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a
period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees
Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is
pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.
780 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one
case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3285 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
3/3
antecedent of one case in that event the provisional anticipatory
bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
8. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner
based on instruction submits that petitioner undertakes to deposit
an amount of Rs. 2,500/- with Lawyers’ Association, Patna High
Court.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.