Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitu Kumari @ Nitu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to surrender within four weeks and a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioners, Nitu Kumari and Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that they had taken Rs 4 lakh from Kunal Kumar over a land dispute and were involved in a violent incident where the informant’s brother and father were shot dead. The petitioners contended that the FIR specifically implicates only Nitish Kumar, not them, and that they have no criminal antecedents. The informant opposed the bail. After hearing both sides, the court decided to grant anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender within four weeks and to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in view of the allegations against them.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 103
  • Section 3
  • Section 482
  • land dispute
  • criminal law
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3292 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2025 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Nitu Kumari @ Nitu Devi W/o Akhilesh Kumar @ Guddu Singh Resident of
                  Village- Dakhingaon, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya, Bihar
           2.    Ankit Kumar S/o Akhilesh Kumar @ Guddu Singh Resident of Village-
                 Dakhingaon, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya, Bihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
                                                  Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Anju Kumari Sinha, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
                 For the Informant       :        Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   26-02-2026                   Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners,

                   learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

                                 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has

                   been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2025 instituted

                   for the offence under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita (in short ‘BNS’).

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioners along with others have taken Rupees Four lakh from

                   Kunal Kumar due to some land dispute and started threatening

                   on demand of the cash. It is further alleged that the brother of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3292 of 2026(3) dt.26-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the informant, namely, Kunal Kumar was called out of the house

          and Nitish Kumar in connivance with two unknown persons,

          first of all fired at the brother of the informant and after that at

          his father. Both of them succumbed to the injuries.

                       4. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

          committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

          case. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has further

          submitted that from perusal of the FIR itself it is clear that there

          is direct allegation against Nitish Kumar of firing. There is no

          any allegation against these petitioners. They are only raised as

          accused. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners has further

          submitted that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned counsel for the Informant has vehemently

          opposed the bail to the petitioners.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

          the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this

          Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The

          petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest

          or surrender in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 290 of

          2025, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3292 of 2026(3) dt.26-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each of them with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Additional District and Sessions Judge-Xth, Gaya Jee, subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.