Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chunnu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners, directing them to furnish the prescribed bond and sureties.

Summary

Chunnu Sahani and Gajendra Sahani were arrested in connection with Suppi Police Station Case No. 100 of 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 900 bottles of Nepal liquor from their possession. The petitioners contend that they were falsely implicated, that the seizure list was forged, and that they have no involvement with the liquor or any criminal antecedent. The State opposed their regular bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined the FIR and the impugned order, noting the absence of specific allegations, lack of independent witnesses, and the petitioners' clean record. Consequently, the Court ordered their release on bail, requiring a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Excise Court‑I, Sitamarhi.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the alleged lack of specific allegations and forged seizure list.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • forged seizure list
  • false implication
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33407 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Chunnu Sahani, aged about 34 years, Gender- Male, S/O Jaymangal Sahani,
                  resident of Village- Dhang, P.S.- Suppi, Dist.- Sitamarhi.
           2.    Gajendra Sahani, aged about 30 years, Gender- Male, S/O Sugarath Sahani
                 @ Sugarath Sahani, resident of Village- Ramnagara, P.S.- Suppi, Dist.-
                 Sitamarhi.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND
                 MALVIYA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with

                   Suppi P.S Case No. 100 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of 900

                   bottles ( 300 ml each bottle) of Nepal Country liquor Karishma,

                   total of 270 litres, in eight jute bags from the possession of the

                   petitioners.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33407 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners have no concern either with the recovered wine or

          any other persons also the petitioners are not the members of

          any group rather the police prepared forged seizure list. He

          further submits that the true fact of this case is that the

          petitioners went to their sister’s village to celebrate while

          returning, the informant stopped him on the way and pressurized

          him to sign several documents which the petitioners refused to

          do so, thereafter he informed to the police and was arrested and

          sent to custody and they are in custody in since 18.03.2026.

                       5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the

          prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. On perusal of the FIR and impugned order dated

          16.04.2026, the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, further

          submitted that there is no specific allegation against the

          petitioners and the alleged allegation against the petitioners are

          general and omnibus. Moreover there is no independent witness

          to the seizure list. Considering the aforesaid facts and

          circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of

          the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on

          bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand)

          each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

          of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I, Sitamarhi in
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33407 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                      3/3




                    connection with Suppi P.S Case No. 100 of 2026.



                                         (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Brajesh Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.