Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shailesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Shailesh Kumar, was arrested on 22 March 2026 after 65 litres of country‑made liquor was seized from a motorcycle he owned, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He applied for regular bail, asserting his innocence, lack of knowledge about the liquor, clean antecedents, and that no incriminating articles were found in his conscious possession. The State opposed the bail, relying on the FIR and the seizure report. The court examined the FIR, the seizure details, and the petitioner’s clean record, noting the absence of an independent witness to the seizure list. Considering these factors, the judge was inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the court ordered the release of the petitioner on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite charges under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016
  • Whether the circumstances of the seizure and the petitioner’s clean antecedents justify granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33716 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Shailesh Kumar aged about 21 years, Male Son of Upendra Yadav, Resident
                 of village - Bazar Verma, PS - Goh, District - Aurangabad
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Ms. Anita Kumari, APP
             ======================================================
          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                   ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                   Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State heard through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar

                   Gaya Ji Excise P.S. Case No. 395 of 2026 instituted for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 65 litres of

                   country made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle bearing

                   Registration No. BR-02BE-7277 driven by the petitioner and

                   arrested at the spot along with seized liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

                   falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner

                   has no connection with the aforesaid liquor. He further submits

                   petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle. He next submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33716 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner has no knowledge about the said recovery. He

          lastly submits that no incriminating articles has been recovered

          from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has

          got clean antecedent as stated in the para 3 of the petition and he

          is in custody since 22.03.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. From perusal of the FIR and impugned order of the

          learned Exclusive Special Excise, Court No. 3, Gaya Ji dated

          09.04.2026, it appears that petitioner is named in the FIR. From

          the perusal of the records it also appears that on the basis of

          written report of the informant, FIR has been registered under

          Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

          Act, 2016 against two accused persons including the present

          petitioner and the allegation is of total 65 liters of country made

          liquor recovered from a motorcycle. Petitioner has got clean

          antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition is in custody since

          22.03.2026 and no there is no any independent witness of the

          seizure list, so considering all these aspects of the case and

          submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined

          to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33716 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     petitioner is allowed.          Let     the petitioner above named be

                     released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3

                     Gaya Ji in connection with Sadar Gaya Ji Excise P.S. Case No.

                     395 of 2026.


                                                              (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.