Patna High Court
Samir KhanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding the allegations vague and the FIR delay unexplained, and ordered release on bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner, Samir Khan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 85 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, alleging mental and physical cruelty and a dowry demand of Rs. 8 lakh. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the trial court rejected on the ground that he is the husband of the informant. The petitioner contended that the FIR was based on concocted allegations, highlighted a significant delay in filing the FIR, and argued that the charges were vague and omnibus. The High Court observed that the allegations appeared general and the delay in lodging the FIR was unexplained, warranting a cautious approach. Consequently, the Court directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. The order effectively granted bail to the petitioner.
Issues considered
- What is the applicability of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry demand under Section 85 BNS, 2023 and Section 3 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961?
- Does the delay in filing the FIR and the general nature of the allegations justify granting bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS?
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 — s. 85
- Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — s. 3
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- bail
- dowry prohibition
- mental cruelty
- physical cruelty
- delay in FIR
- general and omnibus allegations
- Section 85 BNS
- Section 3 Dowry Act
- Section 482(2) BNSS
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33722 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan
======================================================
Samir Khan S/o Babudin Khan Resident of - Asnand Tola Belsara P.S -
Uchkagao, District – Gopalganj, Bihar 841438. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Najiya Khatun D/o Shekh Mohmmd Aslam R/o Village P.O. - Bindusar
Bujurg, P.S - Mahadeva, District – Siwan.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on
behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in
connection with Siwan Mahila Thana P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025
registered for the offences punishable under Section 85 of the
BNS, 2023 and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is to commit
mental and physical cruelty upon the informant alongwith family
members/co-accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of
dowry, as raised for cash of Rs. 8 lakhs.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner that the present FIR was lodged purely on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33722 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
2/3
the basis of concocted allegation as if the facial allegation of the
FIR be taken into consideration, then it appears that the
informant/wife was ousted from her matrimonial home on
20.03.2024 after keeping her jewelries and clothes worth of Rs.
8 lakh. It is submitted that thereafter for more than one year
nothing happened and on one such very occasion i.e. on
09.06.2025, this petitioner after visiting to parental house of the
informant alleged to assault informant and demanded Rs. 8 lakh
from her father. It is submitted that the FIR in issue was lodged
on 03.08.2025 i.e. after about two months of the last occurrence
which alleged to be taken place on 09.06.2025. It is submitted
that the delay to lodge aforesaid FIR not appears explained by
the informant and, moreover, the allegation qua committing
physical and mental cruelty and also to demand of dowry as
alleged appears very much general and omnibus against
petitioner and his family members. It is pointed out that the
prayer of anticipatory bail of petitioner was rejected by the
learned trial court for the simple reason that he is the husband of
the informant. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as the allegation to commit mental and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33722 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
3/3
physical cruelty and also of dowry demand prima facie appears
very much general and omnibus in nature, coupled with the fact
that the delay as to lodge the present FIR prima facie also not
appears explained, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court,
within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be
released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Siwan/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection
with Siwan Mahila Thana P.S. Case No. 63 of 2025 subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.