Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to specified bond and surety conditions.

Summary

Vishal Kumar and Ashok Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that a driver attempted to cause an accident while fleeing from an informant who tried to stop his tractor. The petitioners' names were among twelve accused disclosed by the arrested driver, but no tangible material links them to the alleged offences and no injuries occurred, rendering Section 109(1) inapplicable. The State opposed the bail on the basis of the FIR allegations. The Court, considering the lack of material evidence and the general nature of the accusations, ordered that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail if arrested or surrendered within four weeks, upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the BNSS and Cr.P.C. in view of the allegations in the FIR.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • BNSS
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Arms Act
  • FIR
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3373 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2025 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Vishal Kumar S/o Anil Yadav R/o vill - Dalelchak, P.S.- Belaganj, Distt.-
                  Gaya
           2.     Ashok Yadav S/o Mahendra Yadav R/o vill - Dalelchak, P.S.- Belaganj,
                  Distt.- Gaya
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, Advocate
                                          :       Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   28-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 132, 109(1), 324(2), 352, 351(2) and

                   111 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that

                   the informant while on patrolling duty tried to stop a tractor and

                   the allegation against the driver is that he tried to cause an

                   accident, however, he was caught while he was trying to flee.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   names of the petitioners transpire amongst the 12 named accused

                   persons whose names have been disclosed by the said driver,

                   Upendra Yadav, who was apprehended by the informant. It has

                   further been submitted that besides the said disclosure made by the

                   arrested accused, there is no tangible material available against the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3373 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petitioners. Moreover, no injuries have been caused in the entire

                      transaction, as such, Section 109(1) of B.N.S. would also not get

                      attracted.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations made in the First

                      Information Report.

                                   6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances

                      and considering the fact that the name of the petitioners was

                      featured on the disclosure made by the arrested accused, coupled

                      with the fact of general and omnibus nature of allegations, let the

                      above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their

                      arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period

                      of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case

                      is pending/successor Court in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case

                      No. 506 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under

                      Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya

                      Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.



                                                    (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.