Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AzadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, finding that the circumstances did not warrant denial of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Azad, was apprehended in connection with the seizure of 224.640 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a tempo allegedly owned by him, under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he is innocent, asserting that the tempo was rented to Md. Imran for a monthly rent of Rs.9,000 and that the driver, along with another accused, had already been granted regular bail. The prosecution opposed the petition for anticipatory bail, arguing that the petitioner might be involved in the offence. The Court examined the facts, noting that the driver’s arrest and the rental arrangement raised reasonable doubt about the petitioner’s participation. Relying on Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, the Court inclined to grant anticipatory bail with stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and to comply with conditions regarding appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and refraining from further offences.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in view of the alleged involvement in the seizure of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of ownership and rental of the tempo creates sufficient doubt to merit bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • excise seizure
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNS
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33967 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Azad S/O Md. Akbar Resident of Ward No. 14, Village- Marwan Khurd,
                 P.S- Karja, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.


                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s

                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Madhu Mala Kumari, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                       Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through

                   virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 332 of 2025

                   registered under Section 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3.    As per prosecution case, altogether 224.640 liter

                   of illicit foreign liqour has been recovered from a tempo.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33967 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                            2/4




          petitioner is innocent, has committed no offence and has falsely

          been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the

          petitioner is owner of the seized tempo bearing no. BR06GC-

          2231, which was given to Md. Imran on monthly rent of Rs.

          9,000/-. It is next submitted that the driver Md. Imran was

          handed over the aforementioned tempo and police apprehended

          him along with Dilshad Ali and they have already been granted

          regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

          dated 19.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2451 of 2026 in which

          they have denied that they were the driver of tempo bearing no.

          BR06GC-2231. This fact has been pointed out by the learned

          APP during course of consideration.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          and that the so called driver Md. Imran was the factum of their

          being arrested by the police from the spot with seized article has

          not been denied and it is the case of the petitioner that the said

          tempo was given to Md. Imran on monthly rent of Rs.9,000/-,

          this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to

          the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33967 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                            3/4




          his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

          period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3,

          Saran at Chapra in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No.

          332 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section

          482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other

          following conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailors should be the family

          member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide

          official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every

          date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two

          consecutive       dates     without      plausible   reason   will   entail

          cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or

          promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

          failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

          cancellation of the bail bonds;

                       (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33967 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                         4/4




                       criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.



                                                     (Ajit Kumar, J)
Abhishek/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.