Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Laloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, finding procedural violations in the seizure and noting his clean antecedent.

Summary

The petitioner, Laloo Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 3535 litres of foreign liquor from his vehicle in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner argued that the seizure violated procedural requirements under Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and that he had no knowledge of the seized articles. The State opposed the bail, contending the seizure was lawful. The Court noted the procedural lapses in the seizure and the petitioner's clean antecedent, and therefore granted anticipatory bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and compliance with Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seizure of the liquor complied with the procedural requirements of Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
  • Whether the petitioner's clean antecedent warrants the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • seizure procedure
  • prohibition act
  • excise
  • clean antecedent
  • bail bond
  • section 438 CrPC
  • section 482 BNS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33976 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2026 Thana- THAKURGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Laloo Kumar S/o Ram Jinish Roy R/o Village and PO - Darhia Asadhar, P.S -
                 Angar Ghat, District - Samastipur
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Satyendra Narain Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

                   Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 113 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Prosecution case in brief is that there is reovery of

                   3535 litres of foreigh liquor from the vehicle bearing Registration

                   No.BR09GC 5372.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Eicher Pro 2059xp public carrier vehicle bearing Registration No.

                   BR09GC5372, Engine No.- E446CDTB130501, Chassis No.-

                   MC2EGDRC0TBB65591 which was parked near the garage is said

                   to have been shown to be carrying with the seized article while the

                   submission of the counsel of the petitioner is that the entire seizure

                   was made in the police station there is a violation of Sections 103
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33976 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      and 105 of the BNSS in preparation of seizure and petitioner is not

                      aware with regard to the seized articles and completely deny any

                      connection with the seized articles.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                      anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the fact that there is a violation of

                      procedures prescribed for seizure and as also the petitioner has

                      clean antecedent, the Court is inclined to grant privilege of

                      anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of his

                      arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on

                      bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand)

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                      learned     Exclusive       Special      Judge(Excise-I),   Kishanganj   in

                      connection with Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 113 of 2026, subject to

                      the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of

                      Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik

                      Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                                           (Ajit Kumar, J)
Sanjeev/-
Vikram/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.