Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mantu yadav @ Mantu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted as the allegations of attempt to rape a minor were deemed serious.

Summary

Mantu Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, where he is alleged to have attempted to rape a minor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner attempted to commit rape on the minor victim. The Patna High Court examined whether anticipatory bail could be granted in such serious offences involving a child. Considering the gravity of the allegations, the Court declined to grant anticipatory bail and dismissed the application. The petitioner was directed to surrender within four weeks and seek regular bail before the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to a person accused of attempt to rape a minor under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • attempt to rape
  • POCSO Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • minor victim
  • criminal procedure
  • bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34261 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2025 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Mantu yadav @ Mantu Kumar Yadav S/O Rajendra yadav Resident of
                 village- Jagir Karariya, PS- Kotwa, district- East Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Tuli Yadav S/O Late Nemi Yadav Resident of village- Karariya Jagir, PS-
                 Kotwa, district- East Champaran

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

8   17-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025 instituted under Section

                   74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the

                   POCSO Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   accused of committing an attempt to rape the minor victim.

                                 4. Considering the allegation levelled against the

                   petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

                   petitioner.

                                 5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34261 of 2025(8) dt.17-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. The petitioner is directed to surrender within four

                     weeks from today in the Court below and pray for regular bail.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.