Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satyanarayan YadavversusThe State of Bihar through the Vigilance

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

Satyanarayan Yadav was arrested in connection with a vigilance case alleging defalcation of Rs. 1.5 lakh of government funds and wrongful land acquisition compensation. He faced charges under several IPC sections (467, 468, 471, 409, 419, 420, 120‑B, 447(A)) and sections 13(1), 13(2), (c), (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner had been in custody since 13 October 2025 and applied for bail. The court considered the seriousness of the allegations and the length of his detention, and decided to grant bail. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to appearing in court as directed, with non‑compliance leading to cancellation of bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, considering the nature of the allegations and the period of custody.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • vigilance case
  • corruption
  • IPC
  • Prevention of Corruption Act
  • defalcation
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3479 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-1996 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Satyanarayan Yadav S/o Late Prayag Yadav R/o Village - Ketaribank, P.S -
                 Khaira, District - Jamui

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar through the Vigilance Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rana Hason
                                                  Mr. Homa Yunus
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Arvind Kumar,Law officer, Vigilance
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                    2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Special Vigilance Case No. 1010 of 1996 arising out of

                   Vigilance P.S. Case No. 9 of 1996 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 419, 420, 120-B, 447(A) of

                   the Indian Penal Code and under section 13(2), 13(1), (c)(d) of

                   the Prevention of Corruption Act.

                                    3.   As per the prosecution case, the allegation

                   against the petitioner is that he has defalcated government fund

                   of Rs. 1.5 lakhs as he is said to have taken compensation for

                   acquisition of land wrongfully.

                                    4. The petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025.

                                    5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3479 of 2026(3) dt.25-03-2026
                                                      2/2




                    against the petitioner and also considering the period of custody

                    of the petitioner, this application is allowed.

                                     6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                    bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                    with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                    the learned concerned Court below, where the case is pending,

                    in connection with Special vigilance Case No. 1010 of 1996

                    arising out of Vigilance Case No. 9 of 1996.

                                    7. After being released on bail, the petitioner is

                    directed to cooperate in the trial by appearing personally till the

                    framing of charge, if the charge has not already been framed and

                    after framing of charge he is directed to cooperate in the trial

                    either by appearing personally or through his lawyer. Non-

                    compliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail

                    bonds of the petitioner.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.