Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Prevention of Corruption Act

176 judgments · newest first · showing 1–176

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusASHOK PANDURANG GADEKAR

DISPOSED OFF

The State appealed the acquittal of a police constable who was charged under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe to avoid action against a hotel owner. The prosecution alleged that the constable demanded Rs.5,000, later reduced to Rs.2,500, and that the demand …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusASARAM S/O FAKIRRAO AGALE

DISMISSED

The State appealed against the acquittal of Asaram, a police head constable, who was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding and accepting a bribe to initiate a chapter case. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded Rs 5,000, later reduced to Rs 3,500, and that the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHRIDHAR UTTAMRAO VAKRE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal an acquittal of a supply‑office clerk who was alleged to have demanded an 8% commission as a bribe for clearing a grain supply bill in 2013. The prosecution relied on a recorded conversation, a pre‑trap panchanama, and the testimony of the complainant …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSAMBHAJI KHIRAPPA KHUPSE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of police head constable Sambhaji Khupse, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs 4,000 to send an unserved warrant report. …

THE STATE OF MAHversusASHOK LALCHAND PAWAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Ashok Pawar, a talathi, who was charged under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe to mutate land records. The complainant alleged that Pawar demanded Rs.1,000, later reduced to Rs.300, and that …

SANTOSH DASHRATH PANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Santosh Dashrath Pande, a Gramsevak, was convicted by a Special (ACB) Court for demanding a bribe of Rs.1,500 under sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He appealed the conviction (Criminal Appeal No.191 of 2026) and applied for suspension of the two‑year sentence and …

THE STATE OF MAH and ORSversusYOURAJ BABURAO NILANGEKAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of a clerk, Youraj, who was charged under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a Rs 500 bribe to forward a land‑acquisition proposal. The complainant initially lodged a complaint and was …

THE STATE OF MAHversusASHOK GANPAT LABADE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Ashok Labade, a Tahsildar clerk, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs.200 bribe to obtain a caste certificate. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant and a …

BHAGWAN S/O. TRAMBAKRAO BHEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The appellant, a police head constable, was convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs 1,000 bribe to release a complainant's seized mobile phone and motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied on the complainant’s testimony that the accused …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMDAS SAMBHAJI NITNAWARE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Ramdas Sambhaji Nitnaware, a senior clerk, who was charged under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs 500 bribe to release a demand draft. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the …

BALAJI VITTHALRAO KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Balaji Vitthalrao Kale, an Assistant Registrar, was convicted by a Special Court in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs.5,000 to amend society bye‑laws. He contended that the bribe was actually taken by a subordinate …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSANDU YESHWANT DONGRE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Sandu Yeshwant Dongre, a clerk accused of demanding a bribe for registering a society. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded Rs.1,000 and was found in possession of tainted currency, asserting both …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSURESH SHIVRAJ SHETKAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of a police inspector (accused No.1) and a driving‑school owner (accused No.2) for alleged bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution claimed that accused No.2 demanded Rs …

DILIP BHIKANRAO SOLUNKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, a Talathi, was convicted under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs.1,500 to facilitate land mutation. The prosecution’s case relied on the complainant’s and a shadow pancha’s testimonies alleging a demand, while the defence argued that the payment …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusABASAHEB DNYANDEV CHAURE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of a revenue inspector who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs.5,000 bribe to issue a mutation entry. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant and a shadow pancha, …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDR. RAJENDRA BALU PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal an acquittal of Dr. Rajendra Balu Patil by a Special Judge in a corruption case under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State argued that the prosecution had established a demand for illegal gratification of Rs.20,000 and that the sanction to …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANANDA PATILBA TUPE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, charged Ananda Patilba Tupe, a senior clerk, with demanding a Rs 1,000 bribe to restore a dismissed file. The ACB set up a trap, recording a pre‑trap verification and a main trap, but the conversation was not recorded. The complainant and …

ANANDA PATILBA TUPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ananda Patilba Tupe, a retired Avval Karkun who has not received his pension for over a decade and suffers from health ailments, was acquitted on 18 March 2026 by a Special Judge of charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State subsequently filed …

ANAND DEVIDAS VIDYAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Anand Devidas Vidyagar filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, which rejected his application for discharge under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He also sought condonation of a 115‑day delay in filing the revision. The High Court, …

VILAS RAJENDRA MORALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, a Talathi, was arrested on 18 August 2026 for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.70,000 in connection with a sand‑transportation case, as recorded in a pre‑trap operation. The prosecution presented recovered anthracene‑treated currency notes, a recorded conversation, and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPRAVIN SHANTARM MAHALE AND ANR.

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of an Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector (accused No.1) and a private individual (accused No.2) who were charged under sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs.2,600 to issue driving licences. The …

ASHOK PAMAJEE BORAWAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Three individuals—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. They filed …

NITIN LAMIKANTRAO APASINGIKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Three accused—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. While on bail …

RAJENDRAKUMAR NANARAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Three individuals—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding bribes in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. They filed …

MINAKSHI RAMESH VEDPATHAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Minakshi Ramesh Vedpathak, a former headmistress, was convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a Rs.1,000 bribe, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. She filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the …

PRADIP KAKASAHEB SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Pradip Kakasaheb Sathe, was convicted by a Special Judge in 2025 for demanding a bribe under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He sought a stay of the conviction, arguing that the co‑accused who allegedly received the bribe had been acquitted, that he …

SANJAY NAGENDRABUWA BHARATIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, a bailiff, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs 1,000 bribe to postpone a court appearance. The prosecution’s case relied on the complainant’s testimony and that of a "shadow pancha" who participated in an ACB‑led trap. On …

RAMESH NAGNATH KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The petitioner, Ramesh Nagnath Kadam, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking transfer of Special Case No.81 of 2023 pending before the Sessions Court at Solapur to the Sessions Court at Mumbai, to be heard alongside Special Cases Nos.104 and 108 of 2015. The …

VIPIN KUMAR GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The applicant, Vipin Kumar Gupta, filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order rejecting his discharge application and the charge‑framing order in a CBI case involving alleged conspiracy to divert pre‑shipment finance. The prosecution alleged that Gupta, as a former …

DR TAUSEEF AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Tauseef Ahmad Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (case crime no. 95 of 2025) pending before the Sambhal trial court. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and the trial court verified the compromise on …

NIRDOSH CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nirdosh Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 218, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the IPC and Sections 13, 13(i)a, 13(i)b, 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant argued that the transaction was …

SHER ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sher Ali, a truck driver, was arrested after his vehicle carrying 525 bags of urea was intercepted. He claims he is falsely implicated, is not the owner of the goods, and seeks bail on parity with co‑accused who have already been released. The State’s counsel highlighted his criminal antecedents but …

ABDUL JABBAR SIDDIQUI @ ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Abdul Jabbar Siddiqui applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act, where the alleged conduct occurred in 1999 but the FIR was lodged only in 2009. The applicant argued that there was no need for custodial …

CHANDRADEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17-10-2006 and the related proceedings in S.S.T. No.12 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 420, 471, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. …

ANMOL GOVINDRAM SEKHRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, originally accused No.4, filed a criminal revision seeking discharge from offences under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The revision challenged the order of the CBI Special Judge that had rejected his …

LALU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner Lalu Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his complaint by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the Cr.P.C. He alleged that the magistrate failed to apply a judicial mind to the CCTV footage and other evidence showing that police officials had …

MOHAMMAD IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Imran, a stenographer accused under IPC sections 420 and 120‑B and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly certifying a document. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal history, and argued that the …

SUBHASH BABU @ TITUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Subhash Babu @ Titu, who was arrested in connection with a alleged demand of Rs.10,000 by co‑accused Raj Kumar and is charged under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant has been in custody since 10 October 2025 and …

RAMENDRA @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramendra, an Assistant Store Keeper, was arrested in connection with the alleged loading of three trucks with 525 bags of urea and charged under several sections of the BNS and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He has been in custody since 14 May 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPRAVIN YESHWANT SHIMPI

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a delay of about one year and seven days in filing a leave to appeal against an acquittal order under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State claimed the delay was explained, while the accused contended that the …

C.B.I. ACB, MUMBAIversusVIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant sought condonation of a 179‑day delay in filing an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal dated 31 August 2017, which involved charges under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Respondent …

SURENDRA UGAMARAJ SANCHETI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, step‑father, his sister and nephew, were charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC for abetment of suicide of their step‑son Parth Sancheti. They sought discharge under Section 227 CrPC, arguing lack of proximate cause, absence of any instigation, and that the suicide note …

KRUNALBHAI MANUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Krunalbhai Manubhai Patel, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for alleged offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(a) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State opposed bail, arguing that the …

SAJIDALI GULAMRASUL SAIYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging receipt of illegal gratification under several sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The charge‑sheet had already been filed and the applicant had been in …

LAXMANBHAI GANGJIBHAI MORIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Laxmanbhai Ganjibhai Mori, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 7, 12, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The State opposed the bail, …

NILESH BALUBHAI PANDAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Nilesh Balubhai Pandav, a public servant accused under Sections 7, 13(1)(a) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly accepting a Rs 3,000 …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar through Vigilance Patna, Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, a former Block Development Officer, was arrested in February 2026 for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs. 50,000 under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, asserting that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, …

Zahir AlamversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Zahir Alam, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 20 March 2017 of the Special Judge, Vigilance-II, Patna, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar, a dealer and president of a dealers’ association, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 7(a), 7(c) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that he collected commission on behalf of a Block Supply Officer, demanding …

Anisur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

Md. Afaque AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

UMA SHANKARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

MAKHAN LAL YADAV and ANRversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

Jeetendra Kumar RoyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

RAJEEV KUMAR RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

Pasupati Nath Jha and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

NAUSHAD ALAM and ORSversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a batch of writ petitions challenging the 1999 advertisement that created a panel for appointing 4th‑grade employees to 143 regular posts in Kishanganj district, alleging manipulation, corruption and illegal appointments that deprived genuine candidates. The State and its …

Shailendra Kumar Singh @ Shailendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shailendra Kumar Singh, a Block Supply Officer, was charged under Sections 7(a), 7(c) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for allegedly demanding a commission while allotting cereals. The prosecution alleged he took Rs.12,000 as hush …

Jai Shankar Kumar AnshuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jai Shankar Kumar Anshu, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging he took Rs 1,500‑2,000 to secure inclusion of names in the PM Awas Yojana beneficiary list. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 316(2), 318(4), 316(5), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable …

Sanjay KumarversusThe Central Bureau of Investigation, Patna

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered in 2014 under IPC sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He was alleged to have obtained a Gramin Dak Sevak appointment using a forged certificate from the Bihar Sanskrit …

Upendra KishoreversusPunjab National Bank,

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a registered valuer under Section 34AB of the Wealth Tax Act, was de‑empanelled by Punjab National Bank (PNB) on 18 September 2019 following a show‑cause notice related to alleged valuation lapses in a loan that later became an NPA and attracted a CBI FIR. Subsequently, the Indian …

Imtiyaz AlamversusThe State of Bihar through the Special Vigilance Unit Patna

BAIL GRANTED

Imtiyaz Alam, a revenue employee, was arrested on 20 January 2026 after being caught in a vigilance‑laid trap for demanding a bribe of Rs.15,000 from a complainant seeking correction of land records. The complainant alleged that Alam demanded the money to facilitate the rectification of errors in …

ASHUTOSH THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashutosh Thakur, was arrested in connection with a loan fraud case (Crime No. 988 of 2018) alleging forged documents and money transfers, though he was not named in the FIR. He sought bail, claiming no criminal history, no direct involvement, and that he had already returned the …

Hemant Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Hemant Kumar Prasad, a government servant, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he demanded money to allow a vehicle to pass and seized documents. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, identified as an RTO, demanded Rs.500 from a truck driver, with part of the …

Munchun RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Munchun Ram was arrested on charges under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 308 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs.5,000 while facilitating an electricity connection. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated, he had no …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a revenue officer, was arrested on a charge of taking a Rs.5,000 bribe under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and willingness to cooperate with the trial. The vigilance …

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Satish Chandra Sharma, a Lekhpal, was arrested after a complaint that he demanded Rs 5,000 for handing over possession. He has been in jail since 21 January 2026 and claims he has been falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing his criminal antecedents, but offered no evidence that he would …

MULAYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Mulayam Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated for transferring money to a constable in a case alleged under the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the transfer was a personal loan for a marriage and that there was no …

SHIVSHANKAR PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shivshankar Pal, a Gram Panchayat Adhikari, was arrested for demanding a Rs 10,000 illegal gratification in connection with a Rs 1,25,000 bill, an offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He has been in custody since 21‑01‑2026 and has no prior criminal record. The …

ABHINAV SINGH ALLEGED @ DR RAJIV GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhinav Singh (also known as Dr. Rajiv Gupta) in Crime No. 1422 of 2025, where he was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that …

ANOOP CHANDRA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a Revenue Inspector, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.10,000 in a land‑mutation case and was caught with the money. He has no prior criminal record and has been in custody since 19‑Feb‑2026. The State opposed bail but did not allege any risk of evidence tampering, witness …

KISHUNDEV PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kishundev Pandey, a Gram Panchayat Vikas Adhikari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No. 11 of 2019) alleging offences under several IPC sections and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, stemming from a 2019 FIR concerning alleged misconduct in a road construction project …

VIPIN ALIAS SHIVAM CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vipin Chauhan and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to set aside a September 2025 order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had rejected their request, under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to recall and re‑examine three witnesses. The High …

GULJAR ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Guljar Ali and Jakir Ali, who run an educational institution and were implicated in a 2014 FIR alleging misappropriation of scholarship funds. The charge sheet was filed in 2025, and the applicants claimed they were falsely …

VITTHALBHAI MADHABHAI VEKARIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Vithalbhai Madhabhai Vekaria, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/579/2014) challenging an order of a subordinate court. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision while retaining the right to contest the legality and validity of the sanction granted under …

IKRAAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …

Ram Krit MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Krit Mahto, was arrested on charges under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 10,000. The prosecution alleged that he was caught red‑handed, while the petitioner contended that the FIR was false, the informant was a relative of his …

Nitish Raj @ Nithis RayversusThe State of Bihar through S.P. Vigilance

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Raj, was charged under Sections 7(a), 7(c) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly taking a Rs.50,000 bribe to upload a government scheme online. He pleaded that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and fully cooperated with the investigation, …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pramod Kumar was arrested in January 2026 for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs. 25,000 under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent. The prosecution opposed the bail, asserting the seriousness of the bribery …

Yogendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Yogendra Sah, a Home Guard, was arrested on charges under Sections 7(a), 7(c) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. for allegedly demanding Rs.20,000 to assist an informant. The prosecution claimed he was caught red‑handed in a pre‑ and post‑trap with Rs.15,000 …

Raja KumarversusThe Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna

BAIL GRANTED

Raja Kumar was arrested on 24-12-2025 on allegations of demanding a Rs. 2 lakh bribe to favor an informant in a land dispute, and was caught accepting Rs. 1 lakh. He is charged under Sections 7(a), 7A, and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, …

Ram Kishun SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Kishun Sah, filed a public interest litigation seeking multiple writs of certiorari and mandamus to quash inquiry reports and compel fresh investigations into alleged embezzlement under MGNREGA and other state schemes in Tisiauta Gram Panchayat. The State of Bihar argued that the …

Satyanarayan YadavversusThe State of Bihar through the Vigilance

BAIL GRANTED

Satyanarayan Yadav was arrested in connection with a vigilance case alleging defalcation of Rs. 1.5 lakh of government funds and wrongful land acquisition compensation. He faced charges under several IPC sections (467, 468, 471, 409, 419, 420, 120‑B, 447(A)) and sections 13(1), 13(2), (c), (d) of …

RAVINDER MEHTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ravinder Mehta, an Assistant Inspector General of Registration/Assistant Commissioner of Stamp in Shamli, was arrested after a trap operation alleged that he demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 to settle a stamp duty deficiency. The bail application was filed under Section …

GIRJA SHANKAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Girja Shankar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order and all proceedings in Special Session Trial No. 898 of 2025, arising from a 2012 FIR and a charge‑sheet filed in 2025. He argued that the more‑than‑13‑year delay in …

Mantu Tiwari @ Maruti Nandan TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Mantu Tiwari, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs. 22,000 in connection with a land mutation dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing his clean antecedents, that a co‑accused government servant …

YOGESH PREMJIBHAI SUVARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

31-NOTICE DISCHARGED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners were accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust for issuing dishonoured cheques for the purchase of steel bars, leading to a criminal complaint under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They filed a Section 239 Cr.P.C. …

RONAKKUMAR MANILAL TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Ronakkumar Manilal Trivedi, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act (sections 7(a), 7A, 12, 13(1)(a) and 13(2)). The State opposed bail, arguing the …

BANTI ALIAS MRITUNJAY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists, Banti alias Mritunjay and three others, were charge‑sheeted under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the B.N.S. for injuries inflicted on several victims, including head wounds. They filed a discharge application which the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) rejected, …

SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Three police personnel—Shubham Srivastava, Rajesh Chaudhary and Praveen Kumar—filed anticipatory bail applications under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 162 of 2025 alleging extortion, threats and illegal collection of money under IPC Sections 308(6), 140(2), 351(3), 61(2) and the …

Rajesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Paswan, a junior engineer, feared arrest in a vigilance case alleging fraud amounting to Rs.9,75,424 for passing contractor bills. He contended he was falsely implicated and that the defrauded sum had already been deposited by co‑accused. The court noted his status as a government …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar through S.P Vigilance, Patna

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought to quash the order rejecting his discharge application under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, alleging that the trap operation by the Vigilance Department was fabricated and that the evidence – cash recovered, video, audio recordings – was …

Swati ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar through Vigilance Patna

BAIL GRANTED

Swati Chaurasiya, a Land Survey Officer, was arrested for allegedly demanding a bribe of Rs. 1,00,000 in connection with an ancestral land dispute, invoking Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. She has been in custody since 14‑08‑2025, and a …

KANAIYALAL NAGJIBHAI ROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Kanaiyalal Nagjibhai Rot, a fixed‑term Assistant Depot Manager of Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation, was terminated on 6 March 2021 after an FIR was lodged against him under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120B, the Essential Commodities Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act. …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anuj Kumar was arrested in a case involving alleged collection of money to facilitate candidates passing medical re‑examinations. The prosecution alleged that a newly appointed Sepoy, Niranjan Kumar, collected Rs 3,50,000 from candidates, distributed part to Ankush Kumar and received amounts via …

Ranjeet Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Shankar Prasad, a chief cooperative officer, was charged under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe of Rs 25,000 from the elected president of a PACS in connection with a godown construction application. The prosecution alleged that …

Lakshuman TiwaryversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

ALLOWED

The petitioners, former government employees, challenged the forfeiture of a portion of their pension imposed through departmental proceedings, arguing that they had been acquitted in a criminal trial for the same allegations. The departmental inquiry, initiated in 2008, resulted in a show‑cause …

Raushan Kumar @ Roushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was arrested on 15 October 2025 in connection with a vigilance case (PS No. 91 of 2025) based on an FIR alleging that he demanded Rs 20,000 from an informant to prevent the filing of the FIR, with Rs 12,000 recovered from his possession. He was charged under Sections 7(a), 7A and 12 of …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Sujit Kumar, a government employee in the Education Department, was arrested for allegedly accepting a bribe and subsequently faced a departmental suspension and disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner challenged the departmental proceeding, arguing that the charge memo was not framed in accordance …

TAPAS BASU AND ORSversusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Disposed Off

The applicants, senior officials of MSTC Ltd., filed a revision seeking discharge from a criminal case alleging a Rs 500‑crore fraud, contending that the FIR did not name them and that they had been exonerated in a departmental enquiry. The Special Judge had rejected their discharge application …

RAMESH VASUDEO INAMDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court's order refusing to discharge him in a case involving offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The revision raised grounds of lack of material to frame charges and the absence …

Janardan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Janardan Singh, an Assistant Teacher appointed in 1982, was dismissed from service in 2010 under Rule 20(1) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 after being convicted for offences under Sections 302/34 of the IPC. He appealed the conviction, and while the …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Constable Niranjan Kumar, was arrested on charges under Sections 308(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 7(a), 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly taking bribes on behalf of a senior constable. He applied for …

SEEMANT KUMAR SINGHversusMAHESH PS & ORS.

2023 INSC 272Appeal(s) allowed

During bail proceedings of a police officer (Respondent No.1) under Section 439 Cr.PC, the Karnataka High Court made adverse remarks against three appellants – a senior IPS officer (Appellant No.2) and a district collector (Appellant No.3) – who had no lis in the bail matter, and also directed the …

THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusM. GOPAL REDDY & ANR

2023 INSC 163Appeal(s) allowed

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) appealed against a Telangana High Court order that granted anticipatory bail to M. Gopal Reddy (respondent No.1) under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The Supreme Court …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSUNIL TRIPATHI ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 653Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined appeals by the Union of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a Delhi High Court order that directed the CBI to convert three preliminary enquiries into FIRs/RCs and to complete the investigation. The CBI argued that its preliminary enquiries …

SUKHRAMversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2016 INSC 553Dismissed

The case concerned Sukh Ram, a Gram Sewak, who was alleged to have forged loan applications and misappropriated government funds between 1983 and 1986. During the investigation, an executive magistrate obtained specimen signatures of two witnesses, which were later compared by a handwriting expert …

GOLD QUEST INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2014 INSC 611Appeal(s) allowed

Gold Quest International Private Limited, a numismatic company, faced an FIR under Section 420 IPC and Sections 4, 5, 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act after several customers alleged non‑delivery of promised gold coins. All claimants, including the primary complainant, …

NARINDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2014 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 307, 324, 323 and 34 IPC after the accused and complainant settled their dispute through a village Panchayat. The High Court had refused to accept the compromise, relying …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL

2013 INSC 774Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India suspended an Indian Revenue Service officer in 1999 pending two CBI criminal investigations; the Central Administrative Tribunal later quashed the suspension and directed a review, but the government issued fresh suspension orders in 2012 without complying with the Tribunal’s …

SHEILA KAUL THROUGH MS. DEEPA KAULversusSTATE THROUGH C.B.I.

2013 INSC 692Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Union minister, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC for offences of corruption and criminal conspiracy. She applied to the trial court for exemption from personal appearance, citing her 98‑year age, severe heart disease and senile dementia, and a …

SWISS TIMING LIMITEDversusORGANISING COMMITTEE, COMMONWEALTH GAMES 2010 DELHI

2013 INSC 362Case Allowed

Swiss Timing Ltd., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the Commonwealth Games 2010 Organising Committee to provide timing and scoring services. The Committee failed to pay the agreed fees, prompting Swiss Timing to invoke the arbitration clause in the agreement. The Committee objected, …

ANJU CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2012 INSC 606Dismissed

The case concerned whether a second FIR could be registered in relation to communal violence in Gorakhpur and whether the accused was entitled to a hearing before such registration. The appellant, Anju Chaudhary, challenged a High Court order directing the magistrate to register a new FIR under …

SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusA. RAJA

2012 INSC 352Rejected

Dr. Subramanian Swamy filed a criminal complaint alleging that former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram conspired with Telecom Minister A. Raja in the 2G spectrum scam, seeking to make Chidambaram an accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Special Judge, after examining the material, found …

LOUIS PETER SURINversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 434Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR was lodged in April 1984 under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code alleging that the appellant, then Managing Director of a district agency, conspired with a Deputy Commissioner to award a contract to a private firm. The State Government denied sanction for prosecution …

SUDHIR SHANTILAL MEHTAversusC.B.I.

2009 INSC 1035Disposed off

The case concerned the discounting and rediscounting of two bills of exchange by UCO Bank, allegedly to provide funds to stock‑broker Harshad Mehta for securities transactions. The Supreme Court examined whether the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 …

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AND ANR.versusP. KATA RAO

2008 INSC 529Dismissed

The Managing Director of State Bank of Hyderabad initiated departmental proceedings against P. Kata Rao, an employee, on twelve charges, some of which overlapped with criminal charges for which he was later acquitted. The enquiry officer found him guilty of most charges and the appointing authority …

DIVINE RETREAT CENTREversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2008 INSC 341Case Allowed

A female remand prisoner alleged sexual exploitation by the head of Divine Retreat Centre and complained of police bias. The High Court, acting suo motu on a petition addressed to a single judge and an anonymous letter, ordered the withdrawal of the police investigation of the rape case and …

STATE OF PUNJABversusDEEPAK MATTU

2007 INSC 951Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a public servant, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to 18 months' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed the conviction and, under Section 389 of the CrPC, sought suspension of the conviction; the Special Court granted it, and the High Court upheld the …

C.B.IversusPRADEEP BHALCHANDRA SAWANT AND ANR.

2007 INSC 839Dismissed

The Central Bureau of Investigation appealed against the High Court's order granting bail to Deputy Commissioner of Police Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant, who was arrested in the stamp‑paper scam and charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly facilitating the …

K.KARUNAKARANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2006 INSC 964Disposed off

The appellant, K. Karunakaran, was prosecuted for an alleged abuse of office. The High Court held that no sanction under CrPC Section 197 was required because the appellant was not holding the office at the time the court took cognizance of the offence. The appellant further contended that the …

SHASHIKANTversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 792Dismissed

Shashikant, a railway employee, lodged an anonymous complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleging corruption by several officers. The CBI conducted a preliminary inquiry without registering a First Information Report (FIR) and recommended departmental action, which was carried …

BANSHI DHARversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 764Dismissed

Banshidhar, a Patwari, was suspended in 1976 on allegations of accepting illegal gratification and was convicted under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 161 of the IPC. He was dismissed in 1987 but later acquitted by the appellate court in 2001. By the time of his …

R. SAI BHARATHIversusJ. JAYALALITHA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 668Dismissed

The State alleged that the Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation (TANSI) sold land at a price below market value to a firm in which the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and her associate were partners, thereby causing wrongful loss to the corporation and wrongful gain to the accused. The trial court …

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ON BEHALF OF MONITORING COMMITTEE

2003 INSC 495

The Supreme Court, hearing a writ petition under Article 32 filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta on behalf of a Monitoring Committee, examined the Taj Heritage Corridor project undertaken near the Taj Mahal. The Court found that construction and river‑bed reclamation work had commenced without …

HARDEO SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2000 INSC 318Dismissed

Hardeo Singh, a contractor, obtained overdraft facilities totalling Rs 21.5 lakh from the Birpur branch of Central Bank of India, facilities that were beyond the authorised limit of the branch manager, S.K. Roy, who was alleged to habitually receive illegal gratification from a third party. Although …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusARUN KUMAR AGARWAL AND ORS.

1999 INSC 555Case Partly allowed

Arun Kumar Agarwal and others filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court seeking the cancellation of a 1,000 MW thermal power project at Mangalore and the registration of a FIR for alleged corruption. The High Court, without detailed analysis, directed the CBI to investigate based on thirteen …

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.versusSURYAKANT CHUNILAL SHAH

1998 INSC 458Dismissed

The respondent, S.C. Shah, an Assistant Food Controller (Class II) in Gujarat, was accused of issuing bogus cement permits and fabricating a government stamp, leading to his suspension and two FIRs under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. A Review Committee was convened …

VIJAY KUMAR NIGAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1299Dismissed

V.K. Nigam, a Sub‑Inspector, was found to have received illegal gratification from a gambling organiser and was dismissed from service after a departmental inquiry. He challenged the dismissal, contending that he was not furnished with the preliminary inquiry report, violating natural justice, and …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDR. KRISHNA CHANDRA SAKSENA

1996 INSC 1185Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. K.C. Saksena, a medical officer, was caught in a trap for allegedly demanding a bribe. After investigation, the State Government granted sanction for prosecution under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Before a challan could be filed, Saksena invoked Section 482 of the CrPC and …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusA. JAGANATHAN

1996 INSC 736Disposed off

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the Madras High Court’s order that suspended the convictions and sentences of four public servants, including A. Jaganathan, who had been convicted under IPC sections 392, 218, 466 and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The High Court had relied on Rama Narang …

COMMON CAUSE"REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 605Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the registered society "Common Cause" seeking relief for under‑trial prisoners and accused persons in pending criminal matters. The Court observed that prolonged pendency of criminal cases infringes the right to life and …

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusKALICHARAN MOHAPATRA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 588Appeal(s) allowed

K. Mohapatra, a retired IPS officer, faced a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. While the case was pending, the State of Orissa withheld his gratuity and refused to sanction his final pension, granting only a …

INDERJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1995 INSC 396Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of several government officers accused of embezzling funds allocated for a rural employment scheme in Punjab. The prosecution relied on the report of a Superintending Engineer, thumb‑impression comparisons, alleged extra‑judicial confessions and …

SULEKH CHAND AND SALEK CHANDversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

1994 INSC 428Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, police officers promoted from Assistant Sub‑Inspector to Sub‑Inspector, claimed that their promotion should be back‑dated to 1 October 1982. The respondents, the Commissioner of Police, denied the promotion on the ground that the officers had been charged under section 5(2) of the …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSH. B.R. BAJAJ AND ORS.

1994 INSC 12

The Union of India and the Delhi Special Police Establishment appealed against a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that quashed an FIR registered under sections 120‑B, 418, 468 IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act against Shri B.R. Bajaj, the Finance Secretary of Chandigarh, and several …

SAMPAT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 356Dismissed

Petitioners, comprising 16 MLAs and 3 MPs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a CBI investigation into alleged corruption by Minister Bhajan Lal and the setting aside of a magistrate's order of discharge. The High Court dismissed the petition without addressing the petitioners' locus …

KISHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1992 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

Kishan Singh was convicted under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the High Court dismissed the appeal for default because neither he nor …

ASLAM BABALAL DESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1992 INSC 245

The appellant was arrested for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 323 read with 149 IPC and, after the investigating agency failed to file a charge‑sheet within the 90‑day period prescribed by the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC, the Sessions Judge released him on bail. After the …

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusKAILASH NATH ETC.

1988 INSC 352Disposed off

Kailash Nath, a retired Executive Engineer, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for the purchase of sign boards in 1979; the FIR was filed in 1985, three years after his retirement and six years after the alleged misconduct. He challenged the FIR invoking the third proviso of Rule …

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJ KUMAR

1988 INSC 40Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an Assistant Sub‑Inspector, was caught taking a bribe and was investigated and charge‑sheeted in a criminal trial. He challenged the framing of charges on the ground that the investigation violated Rule 16.38 of the Punjab Police Rules. The High Court held the rule to be mandatory …

A.R. ANTULAYversusR.S. NAIK & ORS.

1986 INSC 223Dismissed

The petition sought revocation of special leave that had been granted by the Supreme Court in the presence of the respondents' counsel after hearing. The Court examined whether it could set aside its own order of special leave, considering the procedural propriety of the original grant and the …

RAGHUBIR SINGH & OTHERS ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1986 INSC 195Dismissed

The petitioners, five accused including Simranjit Singh Mann, were arrested near the Indo‑Nepal border and charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code, while being detained under the National Security Act. They were granted bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMDAS SHRINIVAS NAYAK & ANR.

1982 INSC 57Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra filed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 challenging a Bombay High Court order that the Governor should exercise his own discretion, not the advice of the Council of Ministers, when deciding whether to grant sanction under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption …

STATE OF PUNJABversusCHARAN SINGH

1981 INSC 45Appeal(s) allowed

Charan Singh, a police officer, was convicted under sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Punjab High Court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution was invalid because the police department had not complied with Rule 16.38 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934. On appeal, …

ABDULLA MOHAMMED PAGARKARversusSTATE (UNION TERRITORY OF GOA, DAMAN AND DIU)

1979 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a public servant (A‑1) and a contractor (A‑2) who were charged with conspiracy to cheat the Government by preparing inflated bills, false muster rolls and false statements for a canal‑deepening project. The prosecution alleged that the number of labourers and the work done were …