Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prabhat Ranjan and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court disposed of the application, granting the petitioners liberty to raise their points before the trial court.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 15 May 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya. They requested liberty to raise all points raised in their petition before the trial court at an appropriate stage. The State of Bihar raised no objection to this prayer. After hearing the parties, the High Court disposed of the application, granting the petitioners the liberty they sought. Consequently, the petitioners may now present their arguments before the trial court as requested.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order should be dismissed or allowed to proceed.
  • Whether the petitioners should be granted liberty to raise the points before the trial court at an appropriate stage.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • Quash Order
  • High Court
  • Petitioner's Liberty

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34861 of 2018
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2016 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Prabhat Ranjan S/o Sri Laxman Prasad,
           2.    Sukriti Kumari @ Swikriti @ Sukriti, D/o Sri Laxman Prasad, null
           3.    Urmila Devi @ Urmila Prasad, W/o Sri Laxman Prasad,
           4.    Laxman Prasad, S/o Late Prakash Prasad, All are R/o Urmila Niwas, Dep
                 Nagar, Saraswati Vihar Road No.3, Gulzarbagh, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District-
                 Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar.
           2.    Neha Kumari, D/o Sadan Prasad, R/o VillageP.O.- Tarwan, P.S.- Wazirganj,
                 District- Gaya.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
                 For the State           :        Mr. Kumar Virendra Narayan, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No.2       :        Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   26-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party

                   no.2.

                                 2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed

                   under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated

                   15.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IVth

                   Gaya in connection with S.Tr. No.122 of 2018/ 50 of 2018

                   arising out of Wazirganj P.S. Case No.342 of 2016.

                                 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the

                   petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34861 of 2018(4) dt.26-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        to the petitioners to take all the points raised in the petition

                        before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage.

                                     4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this

                        prayer of the petitioners.

                                     5. Considering the submissions of learned counsels

                        for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed

                        with liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for.



                                                (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.