Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 540 litres of Nepali liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed he was merely a spectator at the scene, had no role in the alleged offence, and that the prosecution’s case lacked any independent witnesses. He also highlighted his clean antecedent and that he had been in custody since 30 March 2026. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the absence of independent witnesses, the petitioner’s clean record, and the weak evidential basis. Consequently, the court granted regular bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond and two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 given the lack of independent witnesses and his clean antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise law
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • clean antecedent
  • lack of independent witnesses

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35063 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Kumar, Male, aged about 59 years, Son of Nanhu Mandal, Resident of
                 Village - Barahi, Police Station - Parihar, District - Sitamarhi.
                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Nand Kumar, APP
              ======================================================
             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                    ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Parihar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 540 liters of

                   country made Nepali liquor has been recovered from a

                   motorcycle.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

                   falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that on the date

                   of alleged incident, the petitioner was standing near the place of

                   occurrence as a spectator and his name has been falsely

                   implicated in this case. He further submits that during
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35063 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                            2/3




          investigation not a single witness has come forward to support

          the prosecution case. He next submits that the seizure list

          witnesses are not the independent witnesses. He lastly submits

          that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the

          petition and he is in custody since 30.03.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. From perusal of the FIR, seizure list and impugned

          order of the learned Special Judge Exclusive Excise Court-01,

          Sitamarhi dated 17.04.2026, it appears that petitioner is named

          in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the

          basis of written report of the informant, FIR has been registered

          under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and            Excise

          (Amendment) Act, 2018 against the present petitioner. It also

          appears that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para

          3 of the petition and is in custody since 30.03.2026 and there is

          no any independent witness of the seizure list, so considering all

          the aspects of the case and submission of learned counsel for

          the petitioner, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the above

          named petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the

          above named petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35063 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                      named be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of

                      Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge,

                      Exclusive Excise Court-01,               Sitamarhi in connection with

                      Excise Parihar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2026.


                                                                 (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr.

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.