Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhagamani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Bhagamani Devi was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Section 304‑B IPC) alleging her involvement in the death of an informant's daughter over a buffalo demand. The petitioner argued that the allegation was based solely on suspicion, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that she lived separately with a clean antecedent, claiming the death was a suicide. The prosecution countered that post‑mortem findings showed cervical fractures, indicating homicide, and noted that co‑accused had been convicted with an appeal pending. The court considered the bail application under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS 2023, weighing the petitioner’s clean record against the seriousness of the charge. It granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a Section 304‑B dowry death case pending trial
  • Whether the evidence on record establishes a prima facie case sufficient to deny bail
  • Application of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS 2023 in granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • Section 304B
  • suspicion
  • postmortem
  • CrPC 438
  • BNSS 482
  • Indian Penal Code
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35189 of 2024
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Bhagamani Devi, W/o Haricharan Singh, R/o village-Akodhi Mela, P.S. -
                 Durgawati, Distt. - Kaimur at Bhabua
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 For the Informant       :        Md. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   29-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State duly assisted by

                   learned counsel appearing for the informant.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending her arrest in connection with Durgawati P.S.

                   Case No.61 of 2024 registered under Section 304-B of the

                   Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per FIR, the petitioner along with other co-

                   accused persons caused death of daughter of informant due

                   to non-fulfilment of demand of a buffalo.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that the allegation is completely founded upon

                   suspicion as admittedly the informant is not the eye witness
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35189 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




          of the occurrence. It is pointed out that petitioner being

          mother-in-law living separately, having no connection

          otherwise with their daily and domestic affairs. It is pointed

          out that the daughter of informant was a short tampered lady

          and out of her temperament, she committed suicide when

          some altercation took place with her husband. While

          concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a lady

          of clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel appearing

          for informant while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that

          apparently it is not a case of suicide as claimed rather upon

          postmortem, three fracture injuries were found on cervical

          and hyoid bone. It is submitted that there is nothing in

          support of submission that the petitioner was living separately

          except averment on affidavit. It is also pointed out that the

          co-accused persons i.e. husband and father-in-law after

          facing trial, were convicted by the learned trial court for

          which, an appeal is pending before the Division Bench of this

          Court.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35189 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 7. In view of the above-mentioned facts and

                    circumstances and by taking note of fact as petitioner is a lady

                    of clean antecedent and claimed to live separately,

                    accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her

                    arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four

                    weeks, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail

                    bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                    sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                    learned S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with

                    Durgawati P.S. Case No.61 of 2024, subject to the conditions

                    as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

                    Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of the

                    Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’).

                                 8.    Learned Trial court is directed to conclude the

                    trial expeditiously.


                                                     (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.