Patna High Court
Md. AshikversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
Anticipatory bail was granted as the bar under Section 76(2) did not apply and the procedural requirements of Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. were not satisfied.
Summary
The petitioner, Md Ashik, sought anticipatory bail after his name was linked to a seizure of 684 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a truck he had owned, which was sold to Dhiraj Kumar Singh on 28‑Oct‑2023 but not transferred in the DTO records. The State opposed bail, invoking Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act which bars anticipatory bail in such cases. The Court examined the sale deed, noted the lack of any material implicating the petitioner, and observed that the procedural requirements of Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. were not complied with. Consequently, the Court held that the bar under Section 76(2) did not apply and granted anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs 20,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The order also required one bailor to be a close family member of the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner despite the bar under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged ownership of the seized vehicle, unrecorded transfer, suffices to attract criminal liability.
- Whether the procedural requirements of Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. have been complied with.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act — s. 30(a), 32(1), 32(2), 41, 76(2)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 103, 105
- Essential Commodities Act — s. 7
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- prohibition act
- ownership transfer
- Section 76(2)
- Sections 103 and 105
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
- Essential Commodities Act
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 35344 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- MAHESHKHUNT District- Khagaria
======================================================
Md. Ashik S/o Md. Sahabaj Resident of Village - Khiribandh, P.S.-
Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-06-2026 Heard Mr. Indeshwari Prasad Mandal, learned
Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Ramesh Chandra, learned
Additional Public Prosecution for the State through virtual
mode.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024, registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(2), 41 of the
Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act read with Section 7 of the
Essential Commodities Act.
3. Acting on a tip of trafficking of illicit wine, the
police conducted raid and intercepted a truck bearing
registration no. BR-10G-5831 as well as other vehicles as has
been disclosed in the F.I.R. In course of search, total 684 litres
Indian made foreign liquor was recovered from the afore-noted
truck besides a huge consignment of liquor from different
vehicles.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 35344 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
2/3
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
the name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case only
on account of he being owner of the truck in question which
vehicle has already been sold to one Dhiraj Kumar Singh, son of
Ram Padarath Singh on 28.10.2023. Despite the vehicle having
been sold, since the ownership of the vehicle has not been
transferred in the DTO Office, the name of the petitioner has
sprung up. Neither the petitioner has any connection with the
present crime, nor during the course of investigation, any
material has come suggesting the complicity of the petitioner. It
is further contended that there is complete defiance of Sections
103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S. Moreover, the petitioner bears fair
antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the
proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that a huge
consignment of illicit liquor was recovered from the truck in
question which is owned by the petitioner. Moreover, there is a
clear bar under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise
Act to maintain anticipatory bail.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by
the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note
of the fact that the name of the petitioner has been implicated in
this case only on account of he being alleged owner of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 35344 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
3/3
vehicle in question which is said to have been transferred in the
name of one Dhiraj Kumar Singh on 28.10.2023 and to support
the aforesaid contention, a copy of the sell letter dated
28.10.2023 has been placed on record as Annexure-P/2; besides,
this Court also find that there is neither any compliance of
Sections 103 and 105 of the B.N.S.S., nor there is any other
material which attracts the rigors provided under Section 76(2)
of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act and the petitioner bears
fair antecedent, let the petitioner above named be released on
bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court
below within a period of four weeks from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail
bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Special Judge Excise-II, Khagaria in connection with
Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024, subject to the
conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of
the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the
petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
sadique/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.