Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arwind RishiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The court grants bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Arwind Rishi applied for bail in an excise case (Case No. 210 of 2026) for alleged possession of three litres of illicit chulai liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution recovered the liquor from a plastic container and opposed bail. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging non‑compliance with mandatory recovery procedures under Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, and noted he has two prior criminal antecedents but is already on bail. The court considered the facts, the petitioner’s custody since 04‑04‑2026, and the procedural claim, and decided to grant bail. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court No. 2, Purnea, and the order was limited to bail considerations only.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail for an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 103 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents affect the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • procedural lapse
  • prior antecedents
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35345 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Arwind Rishi S/o Late Bhagwan Rishi, Resident of - Ward No- 14 Satdov
                 Purnea, P.S- Rani Patra, District -Purnea, Bihar.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                     The matter was heard via video conferencing mode.

                                   2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                   3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Purnea

                   Excise P.S. Case No. 210 of 2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                   4. As per the prosecution case, total three litres of

                   illicit chulai liquor was recovered from a plastic container kept in

                   a bag.

                                   5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. There is non-compliance with mandatory procedure

                   prescribed for recovery under Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

                   Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner has two criminal
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35345 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                    antecedent in which he is on bail and he is in custody since

                    04.04.2026.

                                    6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

                    has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                    7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                    of the case and also considering petitioner’s period of custody, this

                    Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                    8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, be

                    released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                    Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                    the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Exclusive Excise

                    Court No. 2, Purnea, in connection with Purnea Excise P.S. Case

                    No. 210 of 2026.

                                    9. It is made clear that any observation made herein

                    is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                    adjudication of the present bail application. Such observation shall

                    not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and

                    shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                    manner.


                                                                         (Ansul, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.