Patna High Court
Alakh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that no cogent material links the petitioner to the offence and Section 76(2) does not bar anticipatory bail, thereby granting bail.
Summary
Alakh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after police raided an under‑constructed house linked to him and recovered 15 litres of illicit liquor, alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner argued that the recovery was from a structure he did not own, that no material directly implicated him, and that the police witnesses breached Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. The State opposed bail, invoking Section 76(2) of the same Act which it claimed bars anticipatory bail. The Court examined the submissions and found no cogent evidence linking the petitioner to the offence and held that Section 76(2) does not preclude bail in these circumstances. Consequently, the Court granted bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act bars the grant of anticipatory bail.
- Whether the material recovered and the police testimony constitute sufficient grounds to deny bail under Section 30(a).
- Whether the alleged violation of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. affects the bail application.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a), 76(2)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 103
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
- Section 30(a)
- Section 76(2)
- Section 482(2)
- police raid
- under‑constructed house
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 35351 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2026 Thana- Mathurapur District- Samastipur
======================================================
Alakh Paswan S/o Late Ramchandra Paswan Resident of Village- Hansa, P.S.-
Mathurapur, District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anita Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-06-2026 Heard Mr. Mahendra Pratap, learned Advocate for the
petitioner and Ms. Anita Kumari, learned Additional Public
Prosecution for the State through virtual mode.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Mathurapur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026, registered for the
offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
& Excise (Amendment) Act.
3. Acting on a tip off, regarding concealment of illicit
wine, the police conducted a raid in the under constructed house
of the petitioner. However, noticing the police party, the persons
who were assembled there, succeeded in fleeing away. On
search, total 15 litres of country-made illicit liquor was
recovered.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 35351 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
2/3
Court to the search and seizure memo submitted that admittedly
the alleged recovery has been made from an under constructed
house and as such, the petitioner cannot be held responsible for
any recovery. Further contended that the witnesses are none else
but the police personnels and as such, there is clear defiance of
Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. The petitioner bears fair antecedent
and moreover, there is no materials collected during the course
of investigation, which suggests the complicity of the petitioner
in the crime.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that
besides the recovery of 15 litres country-made illicit liquor,
there is a bar created under Section 76(2) of the Bihar
Prohibition & Excise Act to maintain anticipatory bail.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by
the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note
of the fact that the alleged recovery has been made from an
under constructed house and there is no cogent material which
attract the rigors provided under Section 76(2) of the Bihar
Prohibition & Excise Act, as also fair antecedent of the
petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in
the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 35351 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
3/3
a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a
copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise-II,
Samastipur in connection with Mathurapur P.S. Case No. 25 of
2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of
the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further
condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family
members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
sadique/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.