Patna High Court
Bimal Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond and conditions, finding the allegations insufficient to deny bail.
Summary
Bimal Kumar Jha was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment, including offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were vague and the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident. The State opposed the bail, contending that the petitioner had forced the informant into destitution and had ignored an interim maintenance order of Rs.7,000 per month passed by the Family Court. The Court observed that the allegations of cruelty were general and the FIR was delayed, and therefore found no reason to deny bail. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations of mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment.
- Whether the delay in lodging the FIR and the general nature of the allegations affect the bail decision.
- Whether non‑compliance with the Family Court's interim maintenance order is a ground to deny bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2)
- Dowry Prohibition Act — s. 3
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 341, 498A, 504, 506
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- dowry harassment
- mental cruelty
- physical cruelty
- IPC
- Family Court maintenance
- FIR delay
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35524 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura
======================================================
Bimal Kumar Jha S/O Late Bhudeo Jha R/O Village- Vishanpur (Parva Navtal
Panchayat), P.S- Murliganj, Distt.- Madhepura, at present resident of Village-
Murliganj, Ward No.-13, P.S- Murliganj, Distt.- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Champa Kumari W/O Bimal Kumar Jha, D/O Gajendra Khan R/O Village-
Bargayan Ward No. 3, P.S- Basnahi, Distt.- Saharsa.
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
6 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The accused-petitioner, named in the
F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with
Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024
registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian
Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition
Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is to
commit mental and physical cruelty upon the
informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of
dowry as raised for one bullet motorcycle and cash
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
2/4
of Rs. Two Lakhs.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner submitted that allegation qua mental
and physical cruelty as raised against the
petitioner is very much general and omnibus in
nature. It is submitted that only to aggravate the
allegation petitioner was alleged to advance threat
for solemnizing second marriage. It is further
submitted that as per FIR, last occurrence took
place on 10.12.2023 but same was lodged on
07.02.2024, almost after two months without
having any just explanation. Petitioner claimed
clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, while
opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail of the
petitioner, submitted that petitioner forced the
informant to live her life in destitution and he is
also not complying the direction of learned Family
Court, Madhepura as passed for an ad-interim
maintenance, where learned Family Court granted
interim monthly maintenance of Rs. 7000/- per
month to the informant, however, learned A.P.P.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
3/4
fairly conceded that separate execution petition
was preferred by the informant for execution of
aforesaid order before the learned Family Court
itself.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submission
and by taking note of the fact as allegation qua
mental and physical cruelty upon the informant as
alleged to be committed by the petitioner
appearing very much general and omnibus in
nature, coupled with the fact that FIR was also
lodged with a delay of about two months,
accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event
of his arrest/surrender within a period of four
weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged
on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-
Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Madhepura/concerned court in connection with
Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024,
subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
4/4
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short
“B.N.S.S.”).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.