Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bimal Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond and conditions, finding the allegations insufficient to deny bail.

Summary

Bimal Kumar Jha was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment, including offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were vague and the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident. The State opposed the bail, contending that the petitioner had forced the informant into destitution and had ignored an interim maintenance order of Rs.7,000 per month passed by the Family Court. The Court observed that the allegations of cruelty were general and the FIR was delayed, and therefore found no reason to deny bail. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations of mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment.
  • Whether the delay in lodging the FIR and the general nature of the allegations affect the bail decision.
  • Whether non‑compliance with the Family Court's interim maintenance order is a ground to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • mental cruelty
  • physical cruelty
  • IPC
  • Family Court maintenance
  • FIR delay

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35524 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura
                 ======================================================
                 Bimal Kumar Jha S/O Late Bhudeo Jha R/O Village- Vishanpur (Parva Navtal
                 Panchayat), P.S- Murliganj, Distt.- Madhepura, at present resident of Village-
                 Murliganj, Ward No.-13, P.S- Murliganj, Distt.- Madhepura.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Champa Kumari W/O Bimal Kumar Jha, D/O Gajendra Khan R/O Village-
                  Bargayan Ward No. 3, P.S- Basnahi, Distt.- Saharsa.
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   04-02-2026               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                             2. The accused-petitioner, named in the

                   F.I.R., is apprehending his arrest in connection with

                   Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024

                   registered         for     the      offences         punishable           under

                   Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian

                   Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition

                   Act.

                             3. The allegation against the petitioner is to

                   commit mental and physical cruelty upon the

                   informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of

                   dowry as raised for one bullet motorcycle and cash
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/4




          of Rs. Two Lakhs.

                   4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

          the petitioner submitted that allegation qua mental

          and      physical         cruelty        as     raised     against    the

          petitioner is very much general and omnibus in

          nature. It is submitted that only to aggravate the

          allegation petitioner was alleged to advance threat

          for solemnizing second marriage. It is further

          submitted that as per FIR, last occurrence took

          place on 10.12.2023 but same was lodged on

          07.02.2024, almost after two months without

          having any just explanation. Petitioner claimed

          clean antecedent.

                   5.     Learned         A.P.P.      for      the   State,    while

          opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail of the

          petitioner, submitted that petitioner forced the

          informant to live her life in destitution and he is

          also not complying the direction of learned Family

          Court, Madhepura as passed for an ad-interim

          maintenance, where learned Family Court granted

          interim monthly maintenance of Rs. 7000/- per

          month to the informant, however, learned A.P.P.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
                                            3/4




          fairly conceded that separate execution petition

          was preferred by the informant for execution of

          aforesaid order before the learned Family Court

          itself.

                    6. In view of aforesaid factual submission

          and by taking note of the fact as allegation qua

          mental and physical cruelty upon the informant as

          alleged        to     be     committed               by   the    petitioner

          appearing very much general and omnibus in

          nature, coupled with the fact that FIR was also

          lodged        with      a    delay       of    about       two     months,

          accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event

          of his arrest/surrender within a period of four

          weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged

          on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

          (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-

          Divisional                        Judicial                      Magistrate,

          Madhepura/concerned court in connection with

          Madhepura Mahila P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024,

          subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35524 of 2025(6) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       4/4




                     Bhartiya         Nagarik        Suraksha             Sanhita   (in   short

                     “B.N.S.S.”).


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.