Patna High Court
Anandi Sahani @ Anandilal SahaniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that bail should be granted as the conditions for denial under Section 76(2) are not satisfied.
Summary
The petitioner, Anandi Sahani, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged concealment and sale of illicit wine after police recovered 145 litres of country-made liquor near a pond that does not belong to him. The local chowkidar identified the petitioner, leading to a bail application. The petitioner argued that the seizure occurred on property owned by another person, that he has a clean record, and that the provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS were not violated. The State opposed bail, invoking Section 76(2) of the same Act which bars anticipatory bail in such offences. The Court examined the facts, noted the lack of a direct link between the petitioner and the recovered liquor and the absence of any factor triggering Section 76(2), and consequently ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with specified conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the recovery of illicit liquor and identification by a chowkidar.
- Whether Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 bars the grant of anticipatory bail in the present circumstances.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a), 76(2)
- BNSS — s. 103, 105
Subjects
- bail
- illicit liquor
- prohibition law
- anticipatory bail
- Section 76(2)
- fair antecedent
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35681 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2026 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
Anandi Sahani @ Anandilal Sahani Son of Late Rajendra Sahani Resident of
Village- Bara Hardiya, Hardiya, P.S.- Madhuban, East Champaran, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rishav Dev, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 02-06-2026 Heard Mr. Rishav Dev, learned Advocate for the
petitioner and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual mode.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026, registered for the
offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. The police on a secret information regarding
concealment and sell of illicit wine conducted raid nearby a
pond situated at Bara Hardia. However, noticing the police
party, one person succeeded in fleeing away, who was later on
identified by the Chowkidar as the petitioner. In course of
search, total 145 litres country made chulai liquor was
recovered.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35681 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
2/3
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner taking this
Court through the FIR submitted that admittedly the alleged
recovery has been made nearby the pond which belongs to one
Chalhai Sahani and, as such, in no circumstances the petitioner
can be held responsible for the same. There is complete defiance
of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS. The petitioner bears fair
antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the
proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the
huge consignment of illicit liquor has been recovered nearby a
pond and the local Chowkidar has disclosed his name, besides
there is express bar to maintain anticipatory bail in terms of
Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment)
Act.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced on
behalf of the respective parties and taking note of the fact that
the alleged recovery has been made from an open place that
does not belong to the petitioner, coupled with the fair
antecedent as also the absence of any ingredient attracting the
rigors provided under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise (Amendment) Act, let the petitioner abovenamed be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35681 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
3/3
released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
court below within a period of four weeks from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special
Excise Court No. 3, East Champaran, Motihari in connection
with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 101 of 2026, subject to the
conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of
the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the
petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.