Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Laliya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting provisional bail subject to verification of the petitioners' criminal antecedents.

Summary

The petitioners, three women residing in Saidnagar, Darbhanga, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 134.40 litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to their house. They contended that no liquor was found in their possession, the recovery site did not belong to them, and that the police had mechanically implicated them without proper investigation, despite a prior single case under the Excise Act. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, considering these submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.5,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC, directing verification of any further criminal antecedents. The order stipulated that if more than one antecedent is discovered, the bail would not be confirmed; otherwise, it would be confirmed forthwith. The petitioners also agreed to deposit Rs.1,500 each with the Advocates’ Association within two weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the alleged recovery of liquor from a location not in the petitioners' possession justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' prior criminal antecedent affects the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30
  • women defendants
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3581 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2025 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Laliya Devi W/O Harichandra Paswan @ Ramchandra Paswan Resident of
                  Village- Saidnagar, P.S.- Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga
           2.    Pinki Devi W/O Mukesh Paswan Resident of Village- Saidnagar, P.S.-
                 Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga
           3.    Domni Devi W/O Dinesh Paswan Resident of Village- Saidnagar, P.S.-
                 Laheriasarai, Dist- Darbhanga

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners have antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and

                   are women and allegation is of recovery of 134.40 litres of

                   liquor a hut situated beside the house of the petitioners. It is next

                   submitted that petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as

                   such, nothing was recovered from their conscious possession
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3581 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




          and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not

          belong to the petitioners but then is adjacent to their house and

          they came to be implicated at the instance of local person but

          then it is submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case

          relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically

          either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional

          statement or secret information without holding a proper

          investigation.

                       4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       5. Considering the submissions made by the learned

          counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on

          provisional anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in

          the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          Exclusive Special Judge-II, (Excise Act), Darbhanga in

          connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No.603 of 2025, subject

          to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                       6. The application stands allowed.

                       7. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3581 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         accepting the provisional bail bond of the petitioners shall verify

                         the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event, if it is

                         found that petitioners have antecedents of more than one case,

                         then it would be presumed that petitioners for the purposes of

                         obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed their antecedent

                         before this Court, in that event, the present provisional

                         anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on

                         verification, it is found that petitioners has antecedent of only

                         one case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order

                         shall be confirmed forthwith.

                                      8. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners,

                         based on instruction, submits that petitioners undertake to

                         deposit an amount of Rs.1500/- each with Advocates’

                         Association, Patna High Court within a period of two weeks

                         from today.


                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.