Patna High Court
Subodh Kumar SinghversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The application is dismissed for default due to non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Singh, failed to appear before the Patna High Court on two consecutive dates for a criminal miscellaneous application filed in 2018. No counsel represented the petitioner, and the State of Bihar was represented by an A.P.P. No representation was made for the second opposite party either. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court exercised its inherent powers to dismiss the application for default due to non-prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra, and the case was closed without any substantive hearing on the merits.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and shows no interest in pursuing a criminal miscellaneous application?
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- default judgment
- non‑prosecution
- adjournment
- high court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35872 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2014 Thana- MITHANPURA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Subodh Kumar Singh S/o Shri Satyanarayan Singh at Rambagh New
Shastrinagar, P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura District Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Amit Anand, S/o Late Suresh Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Patedini,
P.S.- Balesar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the State : Smt. Meena Singh, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 17-03-2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
2. On the previous date also no one was present on
behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned.
3. Since the petitioner has no interest to pursue this
matter which is of the year 2018, accordingly, the present Cr.
Misc. Application stands dismissed for default due to non-
prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
Checking your session…