Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNS, 2023.

Summary

Prince Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he had enticed and threatened the informant's daughter, who later claimed she was tortured. The petitioner contended that the relationship with the daughter was consensual, that she voluntarily accompanied him, and that no incriminating statements were recorded against him under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNS. The State opposed bail but admitted that the statements under the aforementioned sections did not implicate the petitioner. The Court examined the facts, the lack of adverse statements, and the petitioner’s willingness to comply with bail conditions. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.30,000 and comply with conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNS, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNS, 2023, sufficiently negate the basis for denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 96
  • consent
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • Section 180
  • Section 183

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36051 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2026 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Kumar S/o Dilip Prasad Resident of- Paschmi LOhanipr, Pachkauri,
                 Buddha Murthi, P.S.- kadamkuan, District - Patna, Bihar

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-06-2026                     The Court proceeding is being conducted through

                   virtual mode.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                3. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 255 of 2026, dated 31.03.2026,

                   lodged under Section 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

                   (hereinafter referred to as “BNS, 2023”).

                                4. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged

                   against the present petitioner alleging that he enticed the

                   informant's daughter to accompany him. It is further alleged that

                   the petitioner contacted the informant and his family members

                   and extended threats to them. However, on the following day,

                   the petitioner allegedly left the informant's daughter. Upon
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36051 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
                                            2/3




          being questioned by her family members, she stated that she had

          been subjected to torture during the night of 30.03.2026.

          Thereafter, the present case was instituted.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

          further submits that the daughter of the informant and the

          petitioner were in love and, with her consent, she went with the

          petitioner and lived at the house of the petitioner's friend, and on

          the next day, she returned to her own house. Counsel further

          submits that subsequently, under Section 183 of the BNSS, she

          has not disclosed anything against the present petitioner and

          everywhere she has stated that she had gone with him with her

          consent. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedent of

          the petitioner is not clean, as two criminal cases are pending

          against him. However, he is on bail in both the cases, and both

          the cases relate to the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. Counsel

          also submits that the petitioner is ready to fulfil all the

          conditions whatsoever may be imposed upon him.

                       6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that, from the statements

          recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, 2023,

          nothing has come against the present petitioner.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36051 of 2026(2) dt.01-06-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                    present case, let the above-named petitioner be released on

                    anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                    Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing

                    bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as

                    mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the

                    satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna, in connection

                    with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 255 of 2026, subject to the

                    conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.



                                                                         (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.