Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of ₹30,000 and compliance with the conditions of Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Kavita Devi, was implicated in an excise case (Araria Excise P.S. Case No. 57/2026) after 33 litres of Nepali liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in her name. She contended that she had no knowledge of the contraband, asserting that the vehicle was taken by her nephew without permission, and maintained a clean antecedent. The State opposed bail but also acknowledged her clean record. The court considered the facts, the applicable provisions of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the petitioner's lack of prior offences. It ordered that bail be granted upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bond of ₹30,000 and compliance with Section 482(2) of the Sanhita. The order was delivered virtually by Justice Dr. Anshuman.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
  • Whether the petitioner's clean antecedent and lack of direct possession of the contraband justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • possession
  • motor vehicle
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36353 of 2026

                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Kavita Devi W/O Suresh Yadav R/O Village- Chaoda Manikpur, Ward No. 7,
                 P.S.- Fulkaha, Dist.- Araria.

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s

                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr.Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Arun Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN


                                                    ORAL ORDER


2   03-06-2026                    The Court proceeding is being conducted through

                   virtual mode.

                                 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 3. The petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Araria Excise P.S. Case No. 57/2026 lodged on 13.02.2026,

                   for the offences punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                 4. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 33 liters

                   Nepali liquor, recovered from a motorcycle, is the subject matter
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36353 of 2026(2) dt.03-06-2026
                                            2/3




          of the present case.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. In fact,

          nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

          petitioner, but name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case

          only due to the reason that the petitioner is the registered owner

          of the motorcycle from which the alleged recovery was shown.

          Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

          though the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle but

          his vehicle was taken by his nephew without his permission.

          However, he undertakes that in future he shall not repeat such

          mistake. The antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail but concedes that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

                       7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the

          above-named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of

          four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ₹30,000/-

          (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each, as mentioned in Section

          2(1)(d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to the

          satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions

          Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Judge-II, Araria, in
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36353 of 2026(2) dt.03-06-2026
                                                      3/3




                    connection with the aforementioned case, subject to the

                    conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya

                    Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/Manshi

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.