Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mitranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners as the recovery did not demonstrate conscious possession.

Summary

The petitioners, three relatives from Sukarbeg Chak, were named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 807.925 liters recovered from an open maize field belonging to petitioner No.3. The petitioners contended that the liquor was not in their conscious physical possession because the field is a public place and they have clean antecedents. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed their request for anticipatory bail. The Court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not prima facie indicate possession by the petitioners. Consequently, the Court directed that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from an open field constitutes conscious physical possession sufficient to deny anticipatory bail.
  • Whether anticipatory bail is appropriate under Section 438 CrPC in the present facts.
  • Whether the provisions of Section 482(2) of the BNSS are applicable to the bail order.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36514 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2026 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Mitranjan Kumar S/o Biyendra Singh @ Bijendra Singh @ Munna Singh @
                  Munna Yadav
           2.    Bhutta Kumar @ Amar Kumar @ Anand Kumar S/o Biyendra Singh @
                 Bijendra Singh @ Munna Singh @ Munna Yadav
           3.    Bijendra Singh @ Biyendra Singh, S/o Late Anuj Singh @ Anup Singh
                 All are resident of Village - Sukarbeg Chak, P.S. - Khusrupur, District
                 -Patna.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioners
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                    learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioners are named in the FIR

                    and apprehending their arrest in connection with Khusrupur

                    P.S. Case No.238 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of

                    the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioners is to engage in

                    illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                    recovery of 807.925 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel that recovery
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36514 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                            2/3




          was made from open maize field of petitioner no.3

          whereafter the name of petitioners have been disclosed by

          nearby people out of local dispute and differences. It is

          pointed out that petitioner nos.1 and 2 are son of petitioner

          no.3 and merely as they are son of petitioner no.3, they

          were implicated with present recovery of illicit liquor. It is

          pointed out that the maize field is an open place, which is

          accessible by general public and therefore, it can be safely

          said that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from

          conscious physical possession of the petitioners.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioners.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from conscious physical possession

          of the petitioners, rather from an open maize field,

          accordingly, all above-named petitioners, who are of clean

          antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the

          court below within a period of four weeks from today, are

          directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36514 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Special Judge, Excise, Patna City in connection with

                     Khusrupur P.S. Case No.238 of 2026, subject to the

                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                          (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.