Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners, three relatives from Sukarbeg Chak, were named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 807.925 liters recovered from an open maize field belonging to petitioner No.3. The petitioners contended …
The petitioner, Soni Kumari, was accused in Patliputra Police Station Case No. 383 of 2018 of manufacturing a forged appointment letter, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379 and 34. She feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness …
The petitioner, Nagendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor could belong to other …
