Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request.

Summary

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, filed an application for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 29 January 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No merits of the bail application were considered as the petition was voluntarily retracted.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing an anticipatory bail application before the High Court?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3662 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Ray S/O Janak Ray R/O Village- Baruna Rasalpur,
                 Police Station - Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-01-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                   arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this application for

                   grant of anticipatory bail.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly,        this    application      for     grant     of

                   anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as

                   withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.