Patna High Court
Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The Court held that the recovery of illicit liquor does not prima facie establish the petitioner’s conscious possession and therefore granted bail.
Summary
Dipak Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 1,071.36 litres recovered from his vehicle. He contended that the recovery did not establish his conscious possession and that he had been acquitted in a prior excise case while in judicial custody. The petitioner also argued that his criminal antecedents should not preclude bail, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Prabhakar Tewari v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020). The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail. The Court examined the facts and, noting the lack of prima facie evidence of possession, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond and two sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the excise case despite the recovery of illicit liquor from his vehicle.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Sale and Settlement Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amended 2018 & 2022) — s. 30(a), 32(3)
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- illicit liquor
- possession
- criminal antecedent
- Section 482
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36721 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Singh Son of Parasnath Yadav Resident of
Village- Balesara Tola Jahrule Hatta, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-06-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on
behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in
connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 278 of 2025 registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(3) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amended 2018 &
2022).
3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be
engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,
there is recovery of 1071.360 litres of IMFL/country made liquor
from the vehicle.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that the present case was lodged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36721 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
2/3
25.02.2025, the day on which the petitioner was in judicial
custody in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 521 of 2024 in
which he was later on acquitted. It is pointed out that one of the
reason for suspicion of petitioner is inimical terms with police and
for that reason he was implicated in 17-18 similar nature of
cases, where he is on bail. It is pointed out that the implication of
this petitioner is for the reason that he is the owner of the
vehicle, from which the foreign liquor was recovered. It is
submitted that if merit of this case is otherwise convincing in
favour of petitioner, merely on the basis of his criminal
antecedent, the bail of petitioner ordinarily should not be
rejected. In support of his submission, learned counsel relied
upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available
through Prabhakar Tewari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and
Anr. reported in (2020) 11 SCC 648.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as the recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not
appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of
this petitioner, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event
of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a
period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36721 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
3/3
bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned Special Judge, Excise Court No. II,
Muzaffarpur/concerned Court, where the case is pending in
connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 278 of 2025, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.