Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Sale and Settlement Act (BNSS)

71 judgments · newest first · showing 1–71

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the alleged liquor was recovered from a public area, not from his …

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 259.2 litres of liquor at his house and 345.6 litres from a corn field, along with the seizure of a motorcycle. He contended that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family …

Sahil Saurav @ Saurabh SahilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahil Saurav, was named in an FIR for alleged firing on police at a house under construction that he owned but did not occupy. He claimed the house was uninhabited, the firearms used were licensed, and that he was being implicated for political reasons as a village mukhiya. The …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav @ Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 810 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, he is not the owner of the …

Gurudeo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gurudeo Kumar, was named in an FIR (Araria PS Case No. 45/2026) alleging cheating under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS for failing to deliver goods worth Rs. 2,86,288 between September and October 2025. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising …

Md. Aslam Alam @ Md. AslamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Aslam Alam, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating in a land deal and charged under several sections of the BNS. He contended that he was merely a witness to the sale deed and not a beneficiary of the transaction. The prosecution opposed his bail application, noting his …

Dilip RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 99 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He argued that the FIR did not name the informant, that the alleged recovery was not from his possession, and that the …

Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 5,265 litres of liquor and 10,800 kg of onions from a truck. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the …

Sudhir yadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Sudhir Yadav, Jaikar Yadav and Mukesh Yadav, appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge rejecting their anticipatory bail petition in a case under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They argued that the ordinary …

Manoj SardarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Sardar, a resident of Hasanpur, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 42 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, that the …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from two scooties he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no liquor in his possession, and was unaware that a third …

Sultan @ Md. SultanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sultan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 564 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, …

Subhsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 175.230 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not apprehended at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …

Kapil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Kapil Singh, Harishankar Singh, Roshan Kumar and Rocket Kumar—sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2012 alleging offences under several IPC sections, the Arms Act and related provisions. They claim they have clean records and contend that the complainant, who alleged …

Raj Kumar Rai @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a kiln near the Ganga River. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the site was public, and he …

Manjay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manjay Paswan was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 345.6 litres of liquor from a truck and 43.2 litres from a toto vehicle he owned. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean antecedent and that the liquor was not found in …

Birendra MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Birendra Mahato, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not its owner, and was implicated by a …

Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dipak Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 1,071.36 litres recovered from his vehicle. He contended that the recovery did not establish his conscious possession and that he …

Vikash Nat @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikash Nat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.106/2022) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, involving the recovery of four litres of illicit liquor from a tempo that he did not own. He argued that …

Bhola Paswan @ BholaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three Paswan brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 93.2 litres of liquor from a riverbank location not belonging to them. They argued they were not caught in possession and were implicated …

Akash Kumar @ PanditversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Dumraon P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026) involving alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 68.74 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. He asserted innocence, stating he was not …

Kanhaiya BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kanhaiya Bhagat was implicated in a FIR alleging that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his family with the intention to kill, invoking several sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, false implication, a five‑day delay in …

Raghuwar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raghuwar Sah, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver of the vehicle …

SANJEEV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,203.2 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicles, …

Sanjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from a public place. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the alleged recovery was not from his possession …

Shivandra Kumar Ray @ Shivam MishraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivandra Kumar Ray (aka Shivam Mishra), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(1). He argued that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, that the only …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.14/2025) alleging his participation in an unlawful assembly that assaulted police executing a warrant. The prosecution alleged his involvement in multiple offences under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 1,842 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the truck, and was implicated solely on secret information …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 164.160 litres of liquor were recovered from a Tata Magic vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunita Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2012 murder case (PS No.168) alleging she, along with co‑accused, killed the son of informant Jawahir Manjhi under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34. The prosecution’s case rested on the claim of an illicit relationship between the deceased and the …

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 54.72 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to him, and the …

Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15.12 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that …

Dilip Sah @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 126 litres of liquor from a bush near a Hanuman temple. He has six prior cases under the Excise Act and argues that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his …

Bablu Shrivastava @ Amitabh SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Shrivastava, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, he is not …

Dhauli Devi @ Amita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dhauli Devi and Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in their possession, and the …

Gulten YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulten Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Yadav sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Roshanganj PS Case No.100 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 427 and 307 and Arms Act section 27, where two motorcyclists allegedly set a JCB on fire and shot a helper during bridge construction. The petitioner was not named in the FIR …

Nandu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nandu Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of liquor recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement made by the petitioner’s …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a Sumo vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 478 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case for allegedly transporting 202.5 liters of liquor in a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that his associate …

Mantu Kumar @ Abhishek Raj @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a 2017 excise case involving alleged recovery of 76.5 litres of liquor from a vehicle, for which he was implicated based on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault on a police constable during an incident at Barabar hill, with charges under several IPC sections including assault and attempt to murder. He contended that he was not present at the scene, the allegations were vague, and he had a clean antecedent. …

Mohan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mohan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.9 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property, that he had …

Devendra Bhagat @ Jhagru BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Devendra Bhagat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 116.640 litres of liquor from a public bush near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location was accessible to the public, and the …

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.12 litres of liquor from his Maruti Suzuki car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle was …

Saddam Ansari @ Mir SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saddam Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 189 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, based primarily on a confessional statement made by Dinesh while in police custody. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …

Bulet Yadav @ Bulat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bulet Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 291.84 litres of liquor from a modified three‑wheeler, although he was not apprehended on the spot and claimed he was not the vehicle's owner. He has six prior criminal cases, three of which …

Chhotak BindversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chhotak Bind, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 14 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, …

Shabana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shabana Khatoon, the owner of a scooter and a motorcycle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20.46 litres of liquor from her vehicles. She contended that she was not in possession of the liquor, had no knowledge of its misuse by others, …

Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chhotu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Singh and Kundan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 151.68 litres of liquor. They argued they had no possession of the liquor, the recovery site did not belong to …

Subodh Sao @ SubodhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subodh Sao, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 750 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was implicated …

Ranjan kumar @ Ranjan kumar chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82.5 litres of liquor, of which 22.5 litres were said to be from his premises. He argued that the liquor was found in an open area (palani) accessible to villagers and that …

Bablu Singh @ Ballu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bablu Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 6.84 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the allegation stemmed …

Jitendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the driver misused his …

Chanda KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Chanda Kumari, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 1,290 litres of liquor from a scooter she owned. She contended that she had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of the misuse of her vehicle by …

Sudhir PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sudhir Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the location did not belong to him, and the complainant (the chowkidar) failed to …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor and plastic pouches near Damodar Yadav's submersible. He argued that nothing was seized from his possession, the alleged site did not belong to …

Shushil Sahni @ GorkaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shushil Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a jungle. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged site did not belong to him, and the case …

Dhaneshwar PanditversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhaneshwar Pandit, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 128.625 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was seized from his possession, he was not the vehicle's owner, and the …

Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3.5 litres of liquor from a Safari car. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and …

Kali Rai @ Raj Kishor RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kali Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 160.56 litres of liquor from an orchard he does not own and from which nothing was seized in his possession. He contended that he was implicated solely on secret information without …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a public Bhagwati Asthan. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the alleged recovery site did not belong …

Santu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of jawa mahua from a public area. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the alleged …

Suraj Manjhi @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 21.24 litres of liquor on a scooty. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the scooty at the time, and the case was based solely …

Amresh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amresh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 432 litres of liquor from a public riverbank. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong to …

Ishwardhari DinkarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ishwardhari Dinkar and Bhim Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from the Sone river bank. They argued they have clean antecedents, no liquor was found in their …

Lal Mohan Ray @ Lalmohan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lal Mohan Ray applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 103.86 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. The petitioner claimed he was not in possession of the liquor and that the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Dhiraj YadavversusThe STATE of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Dhiraj Yadav and Navin Yadav sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 100 litres of liquor from a public canal area. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the informant’s identity was …