Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gurudeo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner as the FIR was not convincing and was lodged with an inordinate delay.

Summary

The petitioner, Gurudeo Kumar, was named in an FIR (Araria PS Case No. 45/2026) alleging cheating under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS for failing to deliver goods worth Rs. 2,86,288 between September and October 2025. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, arising from an internal official dispute, and that a departmental proceeding was already underway, making the criminal prosecution unwarranted. He also highlighted that the FIR was lodged on 28 January 2026, a two‑month delay from the alleged incident, without any justification. The State opposed bail, but the court found the FIR prima facie unconvincing and the delay unreasonable. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • What is the adequacy of the FIR and the effect of its two‑month delay on the propriety of granting bail?
  • Whether the allegations of cheating under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS are sufficient to justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • cheating
  • FIR delay
  • Section 316
  • Section 318
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • false allegation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42012 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2026 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Gurudeo Kumar Son of Sri Deonarayan Yadav Resident of Mahalgaon, Near
                 Tower, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Mahalgaon, District- Araria
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.

                   45/2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner failed to deliver different

                   goods of the informant company to the different customers

                   between 02.09.2025 to 31.10.2025 worth of Rs. 2,86,288/-.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that due to certain official disputes

                   present false allegation was raised against this petitioner. It is

                   submitted that departmental proceeding is under progress in

                   furtherance of show cause notice as issued on 25.10.2025

                   against this petitioner and, therefore, prior to arriving on any

                   conclusion that any cheating was made on part of this petitioner,
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42012 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                           2/2




                         the lodging of the present criminal prosecution is completely un-

                         occasioned and unwarranted. It is submitted that last occurrence

                         took place on 31.10.2025 in terms of FIR, where FIR in issue

                         was lodged on 28.01.2026 with the delay of two months, without

                         having any just explanation.

                                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                         taking note of the fact as the FIR in issue prima-facie not

                         appears convincing for allegation of cheating qua petitioner,

                         coupled with the fact as FIR in issue appears lodged with an

                         inordinate delay of two months, without having any just

                         explanation, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of

                         his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of

                         four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond

                         of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

                         like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM,

                         Araria/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection

                         with Araria P.S. Case No. 45/2026, subject to the conditions as

                         laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.


                                               (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Tripathi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.