Patna High Court
Kamlesh KewatversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Holding
The court held that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for pre‑arrest bail and ordered his release on bail subject to statutory conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Kamlesh Kewat, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 13 litres of illicit liquor recovered from bushes behind his house. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was found in an open, publicly accessible area and he had no connection to it. The State opposed the bail, contending that the allegations warranted detention. After considering the FIR and the fact that the recovery was from an open space, the court found a prima facie case for bail. Accordingly, the court directed that the petitioner be released on pre‑arrest bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC and verification of his criminal antecedents. The order will lapse if the petitioner is found to have other pending cases.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre‑arrest bail under Section 482(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
- Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from an open, publicly accessible area establishes a prima facie case against the petitioner.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- illicit liquor
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2) CrPC
- open space recovery
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37336 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2026 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas
======================================================
Kamlesh Kewat S/O Late Ram Pravesh Kewat R/O Village- Barahi, Musai
Tola, P.S- Akorhigola, Distt.- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection
with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 85 of 2026 registered for the
offence(s) punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the allegations made in the FIR, 13 litres of
illicit liquor were recovered from the bushes situated behind the
petitioner's house.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely
been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further
submitted that recovery of illicit liquor has been made from the
bushes, which is an open space and is easily accessible by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37336 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
2/3
anyone. Petitioner has no concern either with the place of
recovery or with the alleged recovered liquor.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the
prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on
behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation
made in the FIR and the fact that recovery of illicit liquor has
been made from the bushes, which is an open space and is easily
accessible by anyone, I am of the opinion that petitioner has,
prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be
released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks
from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Concerned Court where the case is
pending in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 85 of
2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the
petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37336 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
3/3
stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will
automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.