Patna High Court
Manoj Saw @ Shailendra Kumar ManojversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions.
Summary
Manoj Saw, also known as Shailendra Kumar, was implicated in a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) after an informant alleged that his brother was taken by the petitioner and later found dead. The petitioner argued that he has a clean record and that the police investigation concluded with a final report exonerating him, making the FIR based merely on suspicion and the ‘last seen’ theory. The State opposed the petition for anticipatory bail, but could not refute the police’s exoneration. The High Court considered the petitioner's claim of innocence, the police’s final form, and the risk of arrest, and decided to grant anticipatory bail subject to bond and surety conditions. The order directs that the bail be released if the petitioner surrenders or is arrested within six weeks, subject to conditions under Sections 438(2) Cr.P.C. and 482(2) B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the FIR alleging murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.
- Whether the police’s final report exonerating the petitioner warrants the court’s refusal to order his arrest.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 302, 34
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- murder
- Indian Penal Code
- Section 302
- Section 34
- police exoneration
- Criminal Procedure Code
- B.N.S.S.
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37419 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2020 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Manoj Saw @ Shailendra Kumar Manoj Son of Late Makeshwar Saw
Resident of Village - Bazar Samiti, Naya Bazar, Ward No. 28, P.S.- Kabaiya,
District - Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mayank Bilochan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 17-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34
of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant
alleges that on 25.09.2020, Dharmendra and petitioner along
with two unknown accused came at 10:00 p.m. and asked his
brother to accompany them for doing settlement of accounts,
accordingly, his brother accompanied them and did not return in
the night and next day the informant came to know that a dead
body is hanging from a tree near a bridge, hence, he reached the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37419 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
2/4
place of occurrence and saw the dead body of his brother, thus,
alleges based on suspicion that accused persons including the
petitioner might have killed his brother.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the
allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that
informant is not an eyewitness to the occurrence and the entire
allegation hinges around suspicion based on the theory of last
seen. It is next submitted that if the brother of the informant did
not return home in the night then why the informant or his
family members did not try searching him. It is also submitted
that the police, after threadbare investigation, came to a
considered conclusion that petitioner is innocent and, thus,
submitted Final Form No. 457 of 2021 exonerating the
petitioner of the allegation as alleged in the FIR based on the
material which transpired during the course of investigation but
then the learned Trial Court differing with the police report took
cognizance by an order dated 29.01.2025. It is, thus, submitted
that when one investigating agency, after threadbare
investigation, came to a considered conclusion that petitioner is
innocent, whether it would be prudent for the Court to send the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37419 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
3/4
petitioner to jail based on an order of cognizance which came to
be taken based on the same police report which had exonerated
the petitioner of the allegation. It is submitted that if the
privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the
petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to
prove his innocence.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State
and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner but
then are not in a position to rebut the submissions of the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the police,
after investigation submitted final form exonerating the
petitioner of the allegation.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties
and taking into consideration the submissions made by the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, let the
petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case
is pending/Successor Court in connection with Lakhisarai
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37419 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
4/4
(Ramgarh Chowk) P.S. Case No. 491 of 2020, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.