Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties each, if they surrender or are arrested within four weeks.

Summary

Mukesh Chaudhary and Anil Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jogapatti PS Case No. 224 of 2025) registered under sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the petitioners, along with a third accused, attempted to steal the informant's motor pump, but only the third accused was caught and the petitioners escaped. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, were not arrested at the scene, and no incriminating material was recovered from them; they also have no prior criminal record and offered to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the anticipatory bail. After hearing both sides, the Court noted the lack of arrest and absence of seized articles and, considering the allegations, directed that the petitioners be released on anticipatory bail if they surrender or are arrested within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of the same amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Partha Sarthy of the Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the facts disclosed in the FIR justify denial of anticipatory bail on grounds of likelihood of fleeing or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • theft
  • motor pump
  • false implication
  • criminal procedure
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • West Champaran
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3766 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2025 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Mukesh Chaudhary S/o Baldev Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pujaha,
                  P.S.- Srinagar, District - West Champaran
           2.     Anil Chaudhary S/o Lalan Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pujaha, P.S.-
                  Srinagar, District - West Champaran
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Niraj Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioners have preferred this application for

                   grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection

                   with Jogapatti P.S. Case no. 224 of 2025 registered under

                   sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that the three named accused persons including the two

                   petitioners herein made an attempt to steal the motor pump of

                   the informant which he uses in irrigation of his agricultural land.

                   It is stated that Arjun Chaudhary was caught along with motor

                   pump while the two petitioners herein managed to escape.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3766 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. From the

                       FIR itself it would transpire that they were neither arrested at

                       the spot nor any incriminating article recovered from their

                       possession. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and

                       undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

                                    5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

                       learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in

                       the F.I.R., the petitioners not having been arrested at the spot

                       and no incriminating article having been recovered from their

                       possession, it is directed that both the petitioners above named,

                       in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court

                       below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory

                       bail in connection with Jogapatti P.S. Case no. 224 of 2025 on

                       each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                       Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge,

                       Bettiah, West Champaran.



                                                   (Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.