Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Lal Yadav @ Lungi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application for regular bail is dismissed; bail cannot be granted in view of the massive drug seizure and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents.

Summary

Ram Lal Yadav, detained since 24 October 2024, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDNDPS Act where 4,488 capsules of narcotic drugs were recovered from his possession. The petitioner also faces seven other serious charges under the Excise Act, Drugs & Cosmetics Act and the NDNDPS Act. The High Court, recalling its earlier order rejecting bail, held that the large quantity of drugs seized and the petitioner’s extensive criminal antecedents negated any ground for bail. The Court further directed the trial court to expedite framing of charges. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to an accused under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDNDPS Act when a large quantity of narcotics has been seized.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the earlier bail order can be reviewed in light of the present application.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 21
  • Section 22
  • narcotic drugs
  • criminal antecedent
  • trial delay

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3768 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Lal Yadav @ Lungi Yadav S/o- Late Nageshwar Yadav R/v- Indira
                 Nagar, Tikuliya Basti W.No-3, Ps- Jogbani Dist- Araria

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Madan Mohan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                     Heard the parties.

                                 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for

                   grant of regular bail in connection Jogbani P.S. Case No. 214 of

                   2024 registered for the offence under Sections 21 and 22 of the

                   N.D.P.S. Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was

                   rejected vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

                   28664 of 2024 which reads as under:-

                                              Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
                                 and learned APP for the State.
                                              2. The petitioner, who is in custody since
                                 24.10.2024, seeks regular bail in connection with
                                 Jogbani P.S. Case No. 214 of 2024 registered for the
                                 offence under Sections 21/22 of the NDPS Act.
                                              3. As per the prosecution case, total 4488
                                 capsules of narcotic drugs have been recovered from the
                                 possession of the petitioner.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3768 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                                                  4. The petitioner is accused in seven more
                                     similar and serious case under the Excise Act, Drugs &
                                     Cosmetics Act and under NDPS Act.
                                                  5. Considering the huge recovery of narcotic
                                     drugs from the petitioner as well as the criminal
                                     antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant
                                     bail to the petitioner.
                                                  6. Accordingly, this application for regular
                                     bail is hereby rejected.
                                                  7. The petitioner may renew his prayer for
                                     bail, if the trial is delayed.


                                     3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

                        petitioner that the petitioner has seven criminal antecedents and

                        he is custody since 24.10.2024.

                                     4. Considering the huge recovery, this Court finds no

                        ground to review its earlier order.

                                     5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again

                        with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial

                        and frame the charges at the earliest.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.