Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
1034 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
Monu Kumar Gupta, an accused in Criminal Case No. 9633 of 2024 (State vs Hardeep Singh & others) filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, decide the case within a stipulated period. The State opposed …
The applicant, Rajendra @ Babi, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle allegedly carrying spurious liquor, charged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) of the BNS and Sections 60(1), 63, 72 of the Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the contraband, …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where they were charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that the charge under Section 118(2) was unwarranted because the injuries sustained were not grievous, and that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant, the process under Section 82 CrPC, the charge‑sheet dated 5 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 22 January 2016 in a case arising under Section 60(1) of the Excise …
The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 11‑09‑2025 and to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025 in a criminal case under Section 60 of the Excise Act. He alleged that no offence was disclosed …
The applicant, Saurabh, was charged under several provisions of the Excise Act and the BNS in a criminal case pending trial. He applied for bail, arguing lack of criminal history and citing that a co-accused, Satya Prakash, had already been granted bail by a coordinate bench. The court examined the …
The applicant, Lucky Kumar Bhartiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 12‑07‑2023 and to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑04‑2022 in a case under Section 60(2) of the Excise Act. The court examined the FIR and the …
The applicant, Azam, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, fearing arrest after his name appeared in the confessional statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 211 g of heroin. The applicant’s earlier bail …
Ajay Jain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 393 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 60(1) and 63 of the Excise Act. The applicant was not named in the original FIR; his name surfaced only after about two and a half …
The petitioner, Upendra Das, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 95 litres of liquor were recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint family …
Deepak Yadav was arrested in connection with the recovery of 117 litres of codeine cough syrup and charged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act and Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act. The charges were framed on 18 May 2026 and he has been in custody since 20 April 2026, with a prior case under …
The petitioner, Parmatma Yadav, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 42.75 litres of liquor from a khalihan near his house, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He has a prior case under the same Act and has been in custody since 1 May 2026. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Durgesh Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 38 litres of liquor recovered. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from a sack and he had no physical possession or direct …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Mandal, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 3.55 litres recovered from a motorcycle he allegedly jointly occupied. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious physical …
The petitioner, Dinesh Sahni, was arrested in connection with alleged illegal liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with accusations of recovering 100 litres of liquor from a field and 80 litres from a courtyard. He had four prior cases under the Excise Act and had been in custody …
Vicky Kumar was arrested for allegedly recovering 90 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, an offence under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle and was implicated by a watchman, arguing that police often frame innocent persons without …
The petitioner, Rakesh Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 68.400 litres of IMFL recovered from a vehicle bearing registration BR02PB3766. He contended that he was neither the driver nor aware of the consignment, and highlighted his clean …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 100 litres of liquor recovered from a sack tied to a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Paramjit Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 164.4 litres of liquor recovered from an electric auto rickshaw. The petitioner contended that he neither owned nor drove the vehicle and …
Manoj Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 34.56 litres of IMFL recovered from a vehicle parked outside a third party's house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Rajak, was not named in the FIR relating to an alleged illegal liquor trade under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 20 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was recovered from a motorcycle owned by the petitioner, but the …
Awadhesh Rai applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 320.580 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. The petitioner, already in custody since 20 May 2026 and having three prior excise cases, argued that he was not arrested …
The petitioner, Md. Serajul, was arrested on 25 May 2026 in connection with alleged recovery of 236.535 litres of liquor from his house, a joint family property, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Ramesh Ray, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act, with 30 litres of liquor recovered from a field near his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his physical possession and …
The petitioner, Fulena Sahani, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal trading and manufacturing of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Excise Act, with 100 litres of country-made liquor recovered. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open field by the riverbank, …
The petitioner, Manager Rai, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,220 litres of liquor and the destruction of 6,000 litres of mahua jaggery solution, with 360 litres allegedly recovered from his kiln. He has seven prior cases under the Excise Act and has been in custody since 29 May …
The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 85 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 103.92 litres of liquor from an Alto car. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …
Bishnudev Paswan applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 47(a) and (f) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 40 litres of liquor and 600 kg of fermented jawa mahua recovered from his joint family house. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Baban Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14,200 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged liquor was recovered from a public place, …
The petitioner, Ranjit Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 11,160 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized car, was not arrested at the spot, and the …
The petitioner, Ramesh Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from his shop and a …
The petitioners, Aankit Yadav and Papu Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 108 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that they were not …
Mangal Mahto applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.140 litres of liquor and a mobile from a public foot‑over‑bridge. The petitioner claimed a clean …
Ramayodhya Mahto applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his house and another house. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, that no liquor was found in …
The petitioner, Sachin Paswan, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 356 of 2026) for the alleged recovery of 486 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He was not arrested at the scene, did not have the liquor in his conscious possession, and was not the owner of the vehicle. The …
The petitioner, Nippu Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 1.485 litres of liquor recovered. The recovery was made from a hut and not from the petitioner's conscious possession; the allegation stemmed …
Kasim was named in an FIR for alleged illegal trading and manufacturing of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 20 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement of co‑accused Ajay Ram, and Kasim was not apprehended at …
The petitioner, Aashish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 28.125 litres of liquor at his house and 3 litres on a motorcycle. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 47(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.460 litres of liquor. He asserted a clean criminal antecedent and argued that the …
The petitioner, Lalan Kumar Paswan, was arrested on 10 April 2026 after police recovered 112 bottles of codeine‑containing syrup from his courtyard and apprehended him red‑handed. He applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 20 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic …
Md Tamanna, the petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 101.4 litres of liquor were recovered from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Pramod Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, the alleged …
Suraj Kumar Burnwal, the owner of a motorcycle from which 9 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
Anil Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 221.625 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …
The petitioners Shushil Sahni and Gujari Devi applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a third‑party's house. They contended that no liquor was found in their possession, the alleged recovery was from a house not …
Amit Kumar Pandey applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 2.520 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that his friend …
Chandraveer Kumar Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 11,160 litres of liquor from a car. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Suraj Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 16,800 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in …
Bhishma Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and contended that the motorcycle had been stolen, later recovered, and that a friend misused it without his …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 195.120 litres of liquor from an auto. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor, a car and a motorcycle from another individual's house. The petitioner argued that …
Arjun Sahni and Dhruv Sahani filed an anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. Dhruv Sahani was arrested while the application was pending, and the petitioners sought to …
Shravan Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 150 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 41(1) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 1,800 litres of liquor from a truck. The petitioner, who has eleven prior criminal cases (six under the …
The petitioners, Ashish Kumar and Sahib Kumar, were implicated in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7.38 litres and 18.56 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles. They argued that they have no prior …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the recovery of 198.2 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He contended that he had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Devgaura Kumar, sought anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 92 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Excise Act. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, a railway employee, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 12.7 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that the liquor was not in his …
Viro Paswan was arrested in connection with the death of Satish Kumar, alleged to have been assaulted and strangulated by the petitioner and others, and charged under sections 103(1), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was …
Ganesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an excise case (Begusarai Excise Case No.501 of 2025) alleging violations of Sections 30(A), 32(3) and 45 of the Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that liquor was recovered from an auto, …
The petitioner, Kameshwar Sharma, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 405 litres of liquor and seizure of two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued …
Sudhir Kumar was arrested on 25 February 2026 in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act and Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. He had earlier applied for regular bail, which was rejected on 4 May 2026, with liberty to re‑apply after charge‑framing. The petitioner, …
Masrekul Alam, a resident of Kishanganj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,850.480 litres of liquor from a truck. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the seized liquor was not in his conscious …
Pintu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a)(d) of the Excise Act involving recovery of liquor and raw material from the Punpun river. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no contraband was found in his …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He has twelve prior cases, seven of which are under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 21‑05‑2026. The petitioner argued that …
Subodh Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleged to have been involved in the recovery of liquor from a co‑accused and a vehicle. The petitioner, who has five prior cases (three under the Excise Act), argued …
The petitioner, Durgesh Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.41460 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of large quantities of liquor. He had been in custody …
Munna Mukhiya was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor and 3300 litres of liquor solution from five kilns, offences under Sections 30(a), 30(b), 30(c), 32 and 41(i) of the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of …
The petitioner, Sonelal, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He had been in custody since 15 May 2026 and claimed that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
Ajay Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violations of Sections 30(a), 44, 45 of the Excise Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, involving the alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor and seizure of an auto. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no contraband …
Lav Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 46.060 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 240 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a car that he neither owned nor drove. He contended that the recovery was not made from his conscious …
Ankul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 262 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 7.5 litres of liquor. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that …
Tiro Kora applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 95 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …
Vivek Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for possession of 400 grams of cannabis resin and cash. He has been in custody since 12‑December‑2025 and was not apprehended at the scene, but was identified by a co‑accused. The petitioner applied for regular bail, arguing …
Manjeet Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from premises not belonging to him. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Md. Yasin Miya, was implicated in an excise case for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession, was not arrested at the spot, and had a clean criminal antecedent. The State opposed the anticipatory …
The petitioner, Aayendra Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 540 litres of liquor from a …
Kunal Kumar was arrested on 8 April 2026 in connection with Excise Case No. 79, based on an FIR dated 7 April 2026 alleging possession of 182.600 litres of country‑made liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, contending that the seizure …
Aman Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested and had no conscious possession of the seized liquor and money. The petitioner has three prior criminal cases, two …
The petitioner, Harindra Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and bushes. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Sita Ram Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 240 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …
The petitioner, Md. Sofiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 106.5 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Vishwakarma, owner of a truck from which 2638.8 litres of liquor were seized, applied for regular bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He had been in custody since 12 March 2026 and claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware of …
Lalan Singh applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 30(a), 38 and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 112.5 litres of liquor from a car. The petitioner was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle; his implication …
The petitioners, Ranjit Kumar and Tinku Kumar, were arrested on 5 April 2026 for allegedly recovering 520 litres of spirit from a Maruti Suzuki Dzire, alleged violations of Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 and Sections 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act. They …
Bigan Mahto was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He had been in custody since 18‑04‑2026 and claimed that he was not arrested at the spot, that no liquor was found in his possession, and that the allegation …
Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police intercepted a motorcycle and seized 32.25 litres of foreign liquor, leading to an FIR under sections 317(4), 111(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he neither owned …
Rupesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 405.36 litres of liquor were recovered from three vehicles. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 320.760 litres of liquor from an auto and has been in custody since 23 March 2026. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Viccky Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal possession of 25.345 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that his name was linked only through co-accused …
The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 302.75 litres of liquor from a Tata Nexon and the seizure of a …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 82.4 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession of the seized motorcycles, was not named in the …
Avinash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5.58 litres of liquor on a scooty he owned. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and that …
Radhey Shyam Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,128 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He has six prior criminal cases, five of which are also under the Excise Act, and claims he was not arrested at the spot and …
Manju Kumari, the wife of Kabindra Ram, applied for anticipatory bail after a car she owned was seized containing 391.200 litres of liquor, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. She argued that she was not present at the spot, had no knowledge of the driver’s misuse of the …
Vikash Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 178.200 litres of liquor from a hut not belonging to him. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent, no arrest, and that the …
The petitioner, Ram Kumar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was seized from a truck not owned by him and that his name was omitted from the FIR. …
Vifendra Ram and his wife Rinku Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a straw house. They argued that they were not arrested at …
Alok Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 864 litres of liquor from a vehicle. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not have the …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a)(c) of the Excise Act and Sections 112(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from premises and a vehicle belonging to other individuals. He argued …
The petitioner, Bullet Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 115.72 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from five motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a …
Satendra Kumar Keshri was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 1,800 litres and 1,440 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He was not arrested at the spot and the prosecution’s case rested on his ownership of one of the seized vehicles. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Vickey Kumar, sought anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from his scooty. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware …
Ram Lakhan Ram applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 64.200 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles owned by him. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was …
Petitioner Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 450 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He claimed he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …
Amresh Ray applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1)(2) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of illicit liquor from a third party's premises and a vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, had no ownership of …
Petitioner Sanjit Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered for alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery …
Ranjeet Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act alleging the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, merely being …
Anand Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested, no liquor was …
Mina Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Excise Act, arising from a police raid on Nagendra Sahani's house for alleged liquor dealing, during which a crowd allegedly assaulted police. The petitioner, a woman with a …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a public place, no …
Petitioners Rujesh Ram and Sanju Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where liquor was recovered from a joint family house. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, …
The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in …
Kishore Pal was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 127(2), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging that he and four others assaulted an informant with a lathi and an iron rod. The petitioner, who has been in custody …
Sunita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, stemming from a police raid that recovered 1.2 litres of liquor from her residence. She claimed the informant’s allegations were false and that she was not …
Prince Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(c) and 30(d) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 50 kg of jawa mahua from a distillery, which was destroyed. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, that the alleged contraband was not in his possession, …
The petitioners, Sheodayal Ram and Ram Ayodhya Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 53 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at …
Manish Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 11.625 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 0.375 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Rohit Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 518,400 litres of liquor from a vehicle and a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …
The petitioner, Abhinandan Kumar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 18 litres of liquor from his cowshed. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
Surendra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 15 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …
The petitioner, Raja Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 342 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle. He argued that the ownership report of the …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 330.840 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. The …
The petitioner, Dinesh Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a public place near a peepal tree. He has four prior cases under the …
Aman Kumar Giri applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45.6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed a clean criminal record, that he was not arrested at the spot, and that …
Akshay Kumar Ray, the owner of a motorcycle from which 24 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware of any …
The petitioner, Sandeep Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, where 10 litres of liquor and 80 litres of fermented material were recovered from a house that is part of a joint …
The petitioner, Ram Pukar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 225 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized items, and that …
Anil Rai was arrested on 3 May 2026 in connection with a 2021 case involving the alleged possession of 100 litres of illicit liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Section 47 of the Excise Act. The seizure was made from a co‑accused, Jai Ram Kumar, and …
Petitioners Chotu Kumar and Aniket Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.3 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, where 464.94 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a pick‑up van he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
Amit Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up van, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 155.76 litres of liquor. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …
Vikrant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(A), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(iii) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 910.320 litres of liquor from a tractor he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and …
Talib, the owner of a car from which 284 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that he had no knowledge of the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and that the driver acted without his consent. He …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Istekhar Alam, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 27 litres of liquor were recovered from his car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the time of …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Rajak, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 8.640 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was …
Vikash Kumar Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 255.5 litres of liquor from a Chevrolet car he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
Krishna Pasi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not belonging to him and asserting that he was not arrested and has a clean antecedent. The …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of …
The petitioners, Mithlesh Kumar and Sanjit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 154.890 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested …
Laxminiya Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the Excise Act where 34.8 litres of liquor were recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was not in her conscious …
The petitioner, Ashok Nat Dhuman Nat, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the alleged 8‑litre liquor was recovered from a place adjacent to his house, not from his possession, and that the informant (a watchman) had not …
Gore Chaudhary, a resident of Nawada, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a jointly owned house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property being a …
The petitioners, four residents of Rajpur village, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor. They contended that they were not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner, Jitendra Dhangar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 5.220 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not …
Triloki Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 39 litres of liquor, including 4 litres from his shop. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …
Petitioner Rahul Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his conscious …
Ravi Prasad applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in custody, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of ten litres of liquor. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …
The petitioners, three brothers, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. They argued that they were not arrested, …
Vishal Sahani and Subhash Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 175 litres of liquor and 3400 litres of mahua liquor were seized and destroyed from a bamboo orchard belonging to …
The petitioners, six individuals from Gaya district, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 318(4), 112(2) and 61(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 11 of the Bengal Gambling Act, 1867 and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor (2.55 litres) was recovered near Ajay …
Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 200 litres of liquor recovered in a police case. The petitioner argued that his name was only disclosed by a co‑accused and that there was no evidence of his …
The petitioner, Jyotish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of codeine cough‑syrup and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the seized items were not in his conscious …
Pinki Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against her for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from a joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that she was not arrested, no liquor was …
Pinki Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 518,400 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. The petitioner argued that she was not present at the seizure, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Rajak, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that 174.9 litres of liquor were recovered from a car he owned. He argued that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Satish Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 103.680 litres of liquor from his Bolero car. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession …
Domi Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that the case diary had not been …
Rahul Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 153.3 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not arrested, did not have the liquor in his possession, was not the car's owner, and that the case was based solely on a …
Pankaj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(C) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested, that the liquor was recovered from a hut not belonging to him, and that the complaint …
The petitioner, Ankit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, an 80‑year‑old woman named Chalo Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Bandeya PS Case No. 49 of 2026) alleging she dealt in illicit liquor, with 20 litres recovered, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The State opposed the bail, contending the …
The petitioner, Nitu Devi, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where 4.770 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being transported illegally, but the petitioner argued she had no …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 361.875 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
Vinod Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 120.420 litres of liquor from a tractor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, alleging that 200 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed the motorcycle had been stolen before the incident, that he was not in possession of the …
Mannu Gond and Sonnu Gond applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 26.8 litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that they have no prior criminal record, …
Mohan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of his friend's alleged …
The petitioner, Sanket Kumar, was implicated in an Excise Act case (Section 30(a)) for the alleged recovery of 6.105 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that the alleged liquor was not in his …
Surendra Kumar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, involving the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
Shyam Lal Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 38 litres of liquor from his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, the liquor was not in his conscious …
Chandrika Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner claimed that the alleged recovery of 20 …
The petitioner, Amit Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a), 34 and 36 of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 1,176 litres of …
The petitioner, Mithalesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 52.8 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his mother’s name. He argued …
Shankar Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 46.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and an auto. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the seized …
Baiju Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 320 litres of liquor from an e‑rickshaw. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging violations of Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was …
Karmi Devi applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a cycle. She argued that she was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the cycle, and was implicated due to a personal dispute …
The petitioner, Sonu Pandey, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of liquor and cash. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the case was based solely on …
The petitioner, Deepu Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 206.880 litres of liquor from a hut not owned by him. He contended that he was not arrested at …
Dharmendra Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging that 55 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at …
Manish Kumar Mahto applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from an orchard belonging to Pappu Rai. The petitioner asserted that he …
Petitioner Polu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from a river bank. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
Petitioner Chandan Sah was arrested on 27‑04‑2026 in connection with the seizure of 340.32 litres of foreign liquor alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle and not from his conscious …
The petitioner, Geeta Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, with 25 litres of liquor recovered. The prosecution alleged her involvement, but her counsel argued that the liquor was found in an abandoned …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to an excise case (PS Case No. 833 of 2023) involving alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with a seizure of 1500 litres of country-made liquor and 6.75 litres of foreign liquor. The recovery was linked to a Tata …
The petitioner, Rakesh Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Kachchwa P.S. Case No.14 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for possession of 105 litres of desi mahua liquor. The prosecution claimed the liquor was recovered from a location where the accused allegedly …
The petitioner, Sagar Pal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging assault and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted Amit Kamat, fracturing his right hand, and that injuries were …
The petitioner, Gaisul Mian, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant with a farsa, causing a simple incised wound. The prosecution highlighted his prior involvement in a case under Section 323 of the IPC and an …
The petitioner, Naklu, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly concealing illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that a secret informant led police to a 60‑litre gallon from which 40 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving theft of a vehicle, a stolen motorcycle, and illegal arms, alleged under Sections 111 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He claimed that the vehicle was owned by …
