Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Durgesh Yadav @ Durgesh Kumar Yadav @ Durgesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Durgesh Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Criminal Miscellaneous No.41460 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the recovery of large quantities of liquor. He had been in custody since 1 December 2025 and had seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized vehicles, and that the case against him was based solely on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value. The State opposed bail. The Court, after considering the submissions, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of the same amount, and the bail application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the B.N.S. and Excise Act.
  • Whether the confessional statement of a co-accused made in police custody can be relied upon as evidence.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of possession of the seized liquor and vehicles warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • excise law
  • narcotic law
  • evidentiary value

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41460 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2025 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Durgesh Yadav @ Durgesh Kumar Yadav @ Durgesh Kumar S/o Sunil Yadav
                 @ Sunil Kumar Yadav R/o Village - Bishanpur, P.S - Ladania, District -
                 Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2025 and has antecedent

                   of seven cases out of which five cases are under the Excise Act

                   and allegation is of recovery of 216 litres of liquor from a

                   motorcycle and 540 litres of liquor from a car.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41460 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                           2/2




                         any of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on

                         confessional statement of Jai Prakash in police custody which

                         does not have any evidentiary value. It is next submitted that

                         police in majority of cases implicating innocent persons either at

                         the behest of Chaukidar, local person, secret information and

                         confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding

                         a proper investigation.

                                      5. Learned A.P.P. Sri Rabindra Kumar opposes the

                         bail application.

                                      6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                         counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner,

                         above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing

                         bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand)

                         with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                         learned Court below where the case is pending in connection

                         with Ladania P. S. Case No.393 of 2025.

                                      7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.