Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Viccky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied.

Summary

The petitioner, Viccky Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal possession of 25.345 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that his name was linked only through co-accused confessional statements, while the State highlighted his pending criminal case under the Excise Act. The court examined the relevance of the pending case and the nature of the evidence against the petitioner. Considering the petitioner’s criminal antecedent and the seriousness of the alleged offence, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail. However, the court directed that if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks, the trial court should promptly decide on his surrender‑cum‑bail application on its merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the pending criminal case and the nature of the alleged offence
  • Whether the confessional statements of co‑accused are sufficient to justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • confessional statement
  • excise law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42080 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2026 Thana- MANER District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Viccky Kumar Son of Ramnath Rai Resident of Village- Maner Tola, P.S.-
                 Maner, District- Patna.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Manoranjan Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Maner P.S. Case No. 252 of 2026 lodged on 16.03.2026,

                   for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, pending in the

                   Court of Special Excise Judge, Danapur, Patna.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   08 named accused persons including the present petitioner and

                   owner of a motorcycle. Total recovery of 25.345 litres of illicit

                   liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the present

                   case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42080 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                         2/2




                       possession of the petitioner and his name has figured in this case

                       on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused persons. He

                       further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is

                       not clean as there is one case pending against him.

                                    5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                       bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of

                       the petitioner is not clean as there is one case pending against

                       him which is registered under Excise Act and this aspect must

                       be taken into consideration.

                                    6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances, this

                       Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly,

                       the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

                                    7. However, if petitioner surrenders before the

                       concerned Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today

                       then in that case, the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his

                       surrender-cum-bail application on the same day, without being

                       prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been

                       rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the

                       merit of this case.


                                                                     (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.