Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ramesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the recovery of liquor did not constitute prima facie possession by the petitioner, warranting the grant of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramesh Ray, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act, with 30 litres of liquor recovered from a field near his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his physical possession and that he had a clean antecedent, seeking bail. The State opposed the bail application, noting that the petitioner was already on bail in two other criminal matters. The court examined the factual matrix and held that the recovery did not prima facie establish possession by the petitioner, and therefore bail could be granted. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from a field adjacent to the petitioner’s house establishes sufficient prima facie possession to deny bail.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482(2) of the BNSS) despite pending charges under the Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Section 482
  • high court inherent powers

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45995 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2026 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Ramesh Ray S/O Late Sabha Ray R/O Village- Hakma, P.O. and P.S- Bheldi,
                 Distt.- Saran at Chapra- 841419.
                                                                         .. ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Jeetendra Narayan
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Arun Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-07-2026                    Heard the parties

                                2.The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case

                   No. 156 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Section 30(a), 37 of Excise Act.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be

                   engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,

                   there is recovery of 30 litres of IMFL/country made liquor

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that recovery of illicit liquor is made from

                   the maize field, towards north side of the house of the

                   petitioner, which is accessible by general public, where nothing

                   recovered from the conscious physical possession of the

                   petitioner. While concluding arguments, it is submitted that
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45995 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioner found involved in two more criminal cases where he

                        is on bail.

                                      5 Learned APP, opposed the prayer of bail.

                                      6. In view of aforesaid factual and legal submission

                        and by taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima-

                        facie not appears to be made from the physical possession of

                        the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly

                        petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

                        before the court below within a period of four weeks, is

                        directed to be released on bail,             furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                        10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions

                        Judge cum Exclusive Spl. Court, Excise Act 1 st, Saran at

                        Chapra /concerned Court, where the case is pending in

                        connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 156 of 2026, subject to

                        the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.



                                                                (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.