Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chalo Devi @ Panchila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, an 80‑year‑old woman named Chalo Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (Bandeya PS Case No. 49 of 2026) alleging she dealt in illicit liquor, with 20 litres recovered, under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The State opposed the bail, contending the allegations warranted arrest. The petitioner’s counsel argued that she is innocent, has a clean record, and the charges are fabricated. The Court considered the petitioner’s advanced age, the nature of the alleged offence, and the principles governing anticipatory bail. Relying on the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., the Court allowed the anticipatory bail application. The order directed the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions, and clarified that the observations were prima facie and not a determination on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the inherent powers of the High Court.
  • Whether Section 30(a) of the Excise Act justifies denial of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s age and personal circumstances warrant the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • elderly petitioner
  • Section 30
  • Section 482
  • High Court
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38266 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2026 Thana- BANDEYA District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Chalo Devi @ Panchila Devi wife of Late Nandu @ Nandu Chaudhary
                 Resident of village- Bela Waris, Ps- Bandeya, Dist- Aurangabad

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Bendeya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 registered for offences

                   under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is a

                   woman, who is alleged to have dealing in illicit liquor and there

                   is a recovery of 20 litres of illicit liquor.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence.

                   The petitioner is a woman aged about 80 years and the

                   allegations levelled against her are fabricated. The petitioner

                   bears clean antecedent.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                   opposed the prayer for bail.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38266 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                                      6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                      case also the age of the petitioner, this application for

                      anticipatory bail stands allowed.

                                      7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, in

                      the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in

                      the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

                      bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with

                      two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court

                      in connection with Bandeya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026, subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

                      B.N.S.S.

                                      8. It is made clear that any observation made herein

                      is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                 (Sandeep Kumar, J)
sadique/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.