Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalan Kumar Paswan @ Lalan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court dismissed the regular bail application, denying bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Lalan Kumar Paswan, was arrested on 10 April 2026 after police recovered 112 bottles of codeine‑containing syrup from his courtyard and apprehended him red‑handed. He applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 20 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, while the State argued that there was prima facie evidence of his involvement and highlighted a prior criminal antecedent under the Excise Act. The court examined the seriousness of the offence, the material evidence, and the petitioner’s criminal record. Concluding that the nature of the offence and the prima facie material warranted denial of bail, the court dismissed the regular bail application. The judgment clarified that its observations were limited to the bail application and would not affect the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 20 and 21 of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the presence of prima facie material and a prior Excise Act conviction justifies denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • NDPS Act
  • codeine
  • prima facie evidence
  • criminal antecedent
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43873 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2026 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Lalan Kumar Paswan @ Lalan Paswan S/o Sukan Paswan Resident of
                 Village- Yogia, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Abhay Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 20 and 21 of the NDPS Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, 112 bottles of syrup

                   containing codeine (100 ml each) were recovered from the

                   courtyard of the petitioner, from where he was also apprehended

                   red-handed.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

                   Petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2026.

                                5. Per contra, learned counsel for the State

                   vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43873 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                      allegations against the petitioner are serious and grave in nature.

                      It is contended that there exists prima facie material against the

                      petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the

                      offence. It is also submitted that the petitioner has one criminal

                      antecedent under the Excise Act.

                                    6. Considering the nature and the gravity of the

                      offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the

                      petitioner.

                                    7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      dismissed.

                                    8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                     (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.